BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32630294)

  • 1. Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Oliveira H; Brizuela Velasco A; Ríos-Santos JV; Sánchez Lasheras F; Lemos BF; Gil FJ; Carvalho A; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(13):. PubMed ID: 32630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.
    Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I; Kilic K; Bal B; Kilavuz A
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):614-622. PubMed ID: 35603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
    Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration.
    Chidambaravalli K; Krishnan V
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Oct; 46(5):480-490. PubMed ID: 32315437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment-A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Raaj G; Manimaran P; Kumar CD; Sadan DS; Abirami M
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 May; 11(Suppl 2):S347-S354. PubMed ID: 31198367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
    Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2016 Jun; 46(3):152-65. PubMed ID: 27382504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of cortical zone level and prosthetic platform angle in dental implant mechanical response: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Ausiello P; Tribst JPM; Ventre M; Salvati E; di Lauro AE; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2021 Nov; 37(11):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 34497022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Amid R; Rasoolzadeh RA; Motlagh AM; Dehnavi F; Kadkhodazadeh M
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29604944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
    Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.