These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32630294)

  • 21. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Implant Design on Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Study.
    Houshmand B; Ardakani MT; Moscowchi A; Oskoui IZ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(4):39-45. PubMed ID: 36017926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
    Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stress and strain distribution in three different mini dental implant designs using in implant retained overdenture: a finite element analysis study.
    Aunmeungtong W; Khongkhunthian P; Rungsiyakull P
    Oral Implantol (Rome); 2016; 9(4):202-212. PubMed ID: 28042449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation and Comparison of Stress in Divergent and Convergent Collar Designs of Implants With Different Bone Densities: A Finite Element Study.
    Panmei G; Kumar A; Basak S; Anal SS; Nongthombam R; Mall BB
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36550. PubMed ID: 37095819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection Type on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone and Abutment Micromovement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Torkzaban P; Ziaei N; Tootiaee B; Khoshhal M; Vafaee F; Panahandeh N
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2019; 29(2):113-124. PubMed ID: 32464020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Okumura N; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Kurokawa K; Nomura S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2010 Jul; 54(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 20153281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the effects of different implant apical designs on the magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in bone: a finite element analysis study.
    Kadkhodazadeh M; Lafzi A; Raoofi S; Khademi M; Amid R; Movahhedy MR; Torabi H
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2014; 24(2-3):109-19. PubMed ID: 25272209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Endosteal Implants with Different Macro Designs on Stress Distribution in Different Bone Qualities.
    Yalçın M; Kaya B; Laçin N; Arı E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):e43–e50. PubMed ID: 30807621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finite element analysis of a novel implant distribution to support maxillary overdentures.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 23377076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of bone quality on the mechanical interaction between implant and bone: A finite element analysis.
    Azcarate-Velázquez F; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Oliveros-López LG; Torres-Lagares D; Martínez-González ÁJ; Pérez-Velasco A; Lynch CD; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Serrera-Figallo MÁ
    J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103161. PubMed ID: 31255639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
    Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effect Of Tapered And Cylindrical Implants On Stress Distribution In Different Bone Qualities: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Omezli MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):e99–e105. PubMed ID: 31184631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
    Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.