These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3263032)

  • 1. Evaluation of a low-dose neonatal chest radiographic system.
    Burton EM; Kirks DR; Strife JL; Henry GC; Kereiakes JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Nov; 151(5):999-1002. PubMed ID: 3263032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure reduction by use of Kevlar cassettes in the neonatal nursery.
    Herman MW; Mak HK; Lachman RS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 May; 148(5):969-72. PubMed ID: 3495126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experiences with a new film-screen system in pediatric thoracic radiography].
    Leenen A; Brandt GA; Riebel T; Marciniak H
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8963046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new ultraviolet-emitting rare-earth film-screen combination.
    Farajollahi AR; Sutton D
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):629-34. PubMed ID: 9227257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of chest radiography with mobile X-ray units.
    Simpson PD; Martin CJ; Darragh CL; Abel R
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):640-5. PubMed ID: 9849388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
    Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C
    J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimisation of radiation dose and image quality in mobile neonatal chest radiography.
    Hinojos-Armendáriz VI; Mejía-Rosales SJ; Franco-Cabrera MC
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 29605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient dose in neonatal units.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Smet M; Bosmans H; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18757900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose to premature new-borns in the Belgian neonatal intensive care units.
    Dabin J; Struelens L; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23868880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.