143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32630752)
1. Augmented Movelet Method for Activity Classification Using Smartphone Gyroscope and Accelerometer Data.
Huang EJ; Onnela JP
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 32630752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smartphone-Based Activity Recognition Using Multistream Movelets Combining Accelerometer and Gyroscope Data.
Huang EJ; Yan K; Onnela JP
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognition of Typical Locomotion Activities Based on the Sensor Data of a Smartphone in Pocket or Hand.
Ebner M; Fetzer T; Bullmann M; Deinzer F; Grzegorzek M
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33212894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human Physical Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Sensors.
Voicu RA; Dobre C; Bajenaru L; Ciobanu RI
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30678039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasibility study on smartphone accelerometer-based recognition of household activities and influence of smartphone position.
Della Mea V; Quattrin O; Parpinel M
Inform Health Soc Care; 2017 Dec; 42(4):321-334. PubMed ID: 28005434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment.
Lemaire ED; Tundo MD; Baddour N
J Vis Exp; 2015 Dec; (106):e53004. PubMed ID: 26710275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy expenditure estimation during normal ambulation using triaxial accelerometry and barometric pressure.
Wang J; Redmond SJ; Voleno M; Narayanan MR; Wang N; Cerutti S; Lovell NH
Physiol Meas; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1811-30. PubMed ID: 23110944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coarse-Fine Convolutional Deep-Learning Strategy for Human Activity Recognition.
Avilés-Cruz C; Ferreyra-Ramírez A; Zúñiga-López A; Villegas-Cortéz J
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30935117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers.
Skotte J; Korshøj M; Kristiansen J; Hanisch C; Holtermann A
J Phys Act Health; 2014 Jan; 11(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 23249722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Google Fit provide valid energy expenditure measurements of functional tasks compared to those of Fibion accelerometer in healthy individuals? A cross-sectional study.
Arumugam A; Samara SS; Shalash RJ; Qadah RM; Farhani AM; Alnajim HM; Alkalih HY
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(6):102301. PubMed ID: 34592530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analyzing the Effectiveness and Contribution of Each Axis of Tri-Axial Accelerometer Sensor for Accurate Activity Recognition.
Javed AR; Sarwar MU; Khan S; Iwendi C; Mittal M; Kumar N
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32295298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of three accelerometers to investigate lying, sitting, standing and walking.
Valkenet K; Veenhof C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217545. PubMed ID: 31120994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors.
Wu W; Dasgupta S; Ramirez EE; Peterson C; Norman GJ
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):e130. PubMed ID: 23041431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures.
Maes I; Ketels M; Van Dyck D; Clays E
BMC Public Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):1072. PubMed ID: 32631292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Walking Recognition in Mobile Devices.
Casado FE; Rodríguez G; Iglesias R; Regueiro CV; Barro S; Canedo-Rodríguez A
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32098082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of activity classification in younger and older cohorts using a smartphone.
Del Rosario MB; Wang K; Wang J; Liu Y; Brodie M; Delbaere K; Lovell NH; Lord SR; Redmond SJ
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2269-86. PubMed ID: 25340659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Varying behavior of different window sizes on the classification of static and dynamic physical activities from a single accelerometer.
Fida B; Bernabucci I; Bibbo D; Conforto S; Schmid M
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jul; 37(7):705-11. PubMed ID: 25983067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Activity recognition with smartphone support.
Guiry JJ; van de Ven P; Nelson J; Warmerdam L; Riper H
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 24641812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Public Domain Dataset for Real-Life Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Sensors.
Garcia-Gonzalez D; Rivero D; Fernandez-Blanco E; Luaces MR
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32295028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
