244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32631097)
1. A Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between Template Systematic Biopsies Obtained Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Machine and Freehand Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies.
Hoge C; Maynor S; Guan T; Naffouje R; Rao M; Verma S; Sidana A
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 32631097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.
Calio B; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Jain A; Maruf M; Xu S; Yan P; Kruecker J; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Dec; 20(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 28762373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.
Kongnyuy M; Siddiqui MM; George AK; Muthigi A; Sidana A; Maruf M; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Sep; 20(3):348-351. PubMed ID: 28440325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Often Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal Ultrasound?
Herlemann A; Overland MR; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 32868222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial.
Lovegrove CE; Miah S; El-Shater Bosaily A; Bott S; Brown L; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Freeman A; Henderson A; Hindley R; Kaplan R; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario D; Shergill I; Winkler M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31335254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.
Maruf M; Fascelli M; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Kongnyuy M; DiBianco JM; Muthigi A; Valayil S; Sidana A; Frye TP; Kilchevsky A; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 28220802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification.
Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Shakir N; Kadakia M; Maruf M; Frye TP; Mertan F; Su D; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Sep; 48(9):1445-52. PubMed ID: 27305918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Freifeld Y; Xi Y; Passoni N; Woldu S; Hornberger B; Goldberg K; Bagrodia A; Raj G; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; G Roehrborn C; Costa DN
Urol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 37(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30446460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men.
Kongnyuy M; Sidana A; George AK; Muthigi A; Iyer A; Fascelli M; Kadakia M; Frye TP; Ho R; Mertan F; Minhaj Siddiqui M; Su D; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):254.e15-21. PubMed ID: 26905304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection.
Wu CL; Kim M; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM
Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():101-107. PubMed ID: 34461132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer.
Kayano PP; Carneiro A; Castilho TML; Sivaraman A; Claros OR; Baroni RH; Garcia RG; Mariotti GC; Smaletz O; Filippi RZ; Lemos GC
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 30325600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies.
Eineluoto JT; Järvinen P; Kilpeläinen T; Lahdensuo K; Kalalahti I; Sandeman K; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):202-207. PubMed ID: 31102622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
