These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. SQUAT: a Sequencing Quality Assessment Tool for data quality assessments of genome assemblies. Yang LA; Chang YJ; Chen SH; Lin CY; Ho JM BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 19(Suppl 9):238. PubMed ID: 30999844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A proposed metric set for evaluation of genome assembly quality. Wang P; Wang F Trends Genet; 2023 Mar; 39(3):175-186. PubMed ID: 36402623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tigmint: correcting assembly errors using linked reads from large molecules. Jackman SD; Coombe L; Chu J; Warren RL; Vandervalk BP; Yeo S; Xue Z; Mohamadi H; Bohlmann J; Jones SJM; Birol I BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 19(1):393. PubMed ID: 30367597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MaGuS: a tool for quality assessment and scaffolding of genome assemblies with Whole Genome Profiling™ Data. Madoui MA; Dossat C; d'Agata L; van Oeveren J; van der Vossen E; Aury JM BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():115. PubMed ID: 26936254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metassembler: merging and optimizing de novo genome assemblies. Wences AH; Schatz MC Genome Biol; 2015 Sep; 16():207. PubMed ID: 26403281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference-guided de novo assembly approach improves genome reconstruction for related species. Lischer HEL; Shimizu KK BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29126390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of genome assembly reconciliation tools. Alhakami H; Mirebrahim H; Lonardi S Genome Biol; 2017 May; 18(1):93. PubMed ID: 28521789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing Combined with Optical Mapping Yields Completely Finished Fungal Genome. Faino L; Seidl MF; Datema E; van den Berg GC; Janssen A; Wittenberg AH; Thomma BP mBio; 2015 Aug; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 26286689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HGA: de novo genome assembly method for bacterial genomes using high coverage short sequencing reads. Al-Okaily AA BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():193. PubMed ID: 26945881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The power of single molecule real-time sequencing technology in the de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. Sakai H; Naito K; Ogiso-Tanaka E; Takahashi Y; Iseki K; Muto C; Satou K; Teruya K; Shiroma A; Shimoji M; Hirano T; Itoh T; Kaga A; Tomooka N Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16780. PubMed ID: 26616024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage. Chakraborty M; Baldwin-Brown JG; Long AD; Emerson JJ Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(19):e147. PubMed ID: 27458204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome size and chromosome number are critical metrics for accurate genome assembly assessment in Eukaryota. Hjelmen CE Genetics; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38869251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A hybrid approach for de novo human genome sequence assembly and phasing. Mostovoy Y; Levy-Sakin M; Lam J; Lam ET; Hastie AR; Marks P; Lee J; Chu C; Lin C; Džakula Ž; Cao H; Schlebusch SA; Giorda K; Schnall-Levin M; Wall JD; Kwok PY Nat Methods; 2016 Jul; 13(7):587-90. PubMed ID: 27159086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different sequencing and assembly strategies for a repeat-rich fungal genome, Ophiocordyceps sinensis. Li Y; Hsiang T; Yang RH; Hu XD; Wang K; Wang WJ; Wang XL; Jiao L; Yao YJ J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Sep; 128():1-6. PubMed ID: 27343682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. dnAQET: a framework to compute a consolidated metric for benchmarking quality of de novo assemblies. Yavas G; Hong H; Xiao W BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):706. PubMed ID: 31510940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]