These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32631638)
21. Integrating a Facially Driven Treatment Planning to the Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Edentulous Arches: A Case Report. Creagh J; Bohner L; Sesma N; Coachman C J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1393-1397. PubMed ID: 33893265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Integrating intraoral, perioral, and facial scans into the design of digital dentures. Lo Russo L; Di Gioia C; Salamini A; Guida L J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):584-588. PubMed ID: 31326147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch. Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. Kim JE; Amelya A; Shin Y; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):755-761. PubMed ID: 27863856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiple digital impression systems on a fully edentulous maxilla. Gutmacher Z; Kelly A; Renne W; Hoover M; Mennito A; Teich S; Cayouette M; Ludlow M Quintessence Int; 2021 May; 52(6):488-495. PubMed ID: 33880909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Denture scanning technique for computer-guided implant-supported restoration treatment of edentulous patients. Moura GF; Siqueira R; Meirelles L; Maska B; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):726-731. PubMed ID: 32586618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Creating a virtual patient for completely edentulous computer-aided implant surgery: A dental technique. Li J; Sommer C; Wang HL; Lepidi L; Joda T; Mendonca G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):564-568. PubMed ID: 32376032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study. Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: A systematic review. Carneiro Pereira AL; Medeiros VR; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 33268069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: A dental technique. Qu F; Du X; Liu WC J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30006221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fabrication of a 3-dimensionally printed definitive cast for an obturator prosthesis by merging intraoral scan image with cone beam computed tomography data: A clinical report. Murat S; Batak B J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):256.e1-256.e4. PubMed ID: 33309209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part I: Clinical evidence, digital impression, and maxillomandibular relationship record. Fueki K; Inamochi Y; Wada J; Arai Y; Takaichi A; Murakami N; Ueno T; Wakabayashi N J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jan; 66(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 33504721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Single-arch digital removable complete denture: A workflow that starts from the intraoral scan. Lo Russo L; Salamini A J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 29195814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital workflow for implant-supported fixed complete dentures based on backwards planning in an edentulous patient. Al-Haj Husain N; Molinero-Mourelle P; Janner SFM; Brägger U; Özcan M; Schimmel M; Revilla-Léon M; Abou-Ayash S Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 34006066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Alignment of intraoral scans and registration of maxillo-mandibular relationships for the edentulous maxillary arch. Lo Russo L; Ciavarella D; Salamini A; Guida L J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):737-740. PubMed ID: 30617035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cast-free digital workflow for implant-supported rehabilitation in a completely edentulous patient: A clinical report. Beretta M; Poli PP; Tansella S; Aguzzi M; Meoli A; Maiorana C J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 32087844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae. Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Removable complete digital dentures: A workflow that integrates open technologies. Lo Russo L; Salamini A J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):727-732. PubMed ID: 28965681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique. Iturrate M; Minguez R; Pradies G; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):237-241. PubMed ID: 30093123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]