135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32631640)
1. Comparison of excess cement around implant crown margins by using 3 extraoral cementation techniques.
Jagathpal AJ; Vally ZI; Sykes LM; du Toit J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 32631640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro investigation comparing methods of minimizing excess luting agent for cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Bukhari SA; AlHelal A; Kattadiyil MT; Wadhwani CPK; Taleb A; Dehom S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 31987589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cement Removal From Implant-Retained Crowns Using a Proposed "Circular Crisscross" Flossing Technique.
Ferreira CF; Shafter M; Jain V; Wicks RA; Linder E; da Silva Ledo CA
J Oral Implantol; 2018 Jun; 44(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29436969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations.
Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al-Qarni MN; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Maflehi NS; Abualsaud HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant-supported restorations?: An in vitro study.
Gönder A; Polat S; Kılıçarslan MA; Ocak M; Tamam E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):807-814. PubMed ID: 37232125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Canullo L; Cocchetto R; Marinotti F; Oltra DP; Diago MP; Loi I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess.
Zaugg LK; Zehnder I; Rohr N; Fischer J; Zitzmann NU
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29044723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Novel Universal Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Crowns with Subgingival Margins.
Bhushan P; Aras MA; Chitre V; Mysore AR; Daswani SR
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):628-632. PubMed ID: 26861492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants.
Wang W; Chang J; Wang HM; Gu XH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 31383528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins.
Rayyan MM; Makarem HA
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):840-842. PubMed ID: 27460328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-space technique for creating cement space in a cementation device for implant dentistry: A predictable chairside approach.
Esquivel J; Piñeyro A
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 31753455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT.
Andrijauskas P; Zukauskas S; Alkimavicius J; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):549-558. PubMed ID: 33595848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
