These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32631729)

  • 21. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
    Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment.
    Seth AK; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Feb; 137(2):287e-295e. PubMed ID: 26818318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
    Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for shoulder arthroplasty from top academic orthopedic institutions.
    Stelzer JW; Wellington IJ; Trudeau MT; Mancini MR; LeVasseur MR; Messina JC; Mazzocca AD
    JSES Int; 2022 Jan; 6(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 35141675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
    Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
    Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
    Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences.
    Baldwin AJ
    Hand (N Y); 2024 Oct; 19(7):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 37131334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.
    Hartnett DA; Philips AP; Daniels AH; Blankenhorn BD
    Foot (Edinb); 2023 Mar; 54():101985. PubMed ID: 36827889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
    Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.
    Cook JA; Sasor SE; Tholpady SS; Momeni A; Chu MW
    Hand (N Y); 2018 Sep; 13(5):547-551. PubMed ID: 28825342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis.
    Nickles MA; Ramani SL; Tegtmeyer K; Zhao J; Lio PA
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 38(2):544-546. PubMed ID: 33452694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.
    Ramirez JL; Wang K; Sung E; Hernandez S; Le M; Avra TD; Talutis S; Iannuzzi JC; Ulloa JG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 101():157-163. PubMed ID: 38154492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.
    Kasabwala K; Misra P; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Baredes S; Setzen M; Eloy JA
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Apr; 3(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 23044857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.
    Kugar MA; Cohen AC; Wooden W; Tholpady SS; Chu MW
    J Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 218():43-48. PubMed ID: 28985876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How understandable are the patient education materials about flat foot on the Internet for parents?
    Çiftci S; Şahin E; Aktaş SA; Safali S; Durgut F; Aydin BK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32791. PubMed ID: 36820566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.
    Ricci JA; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lin SJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):1573-1579. PubMed ID: 26017593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: an analysis of readability.
    Vargas CR; Koolen PGL; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 25158700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.