These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32632010)

  • 1. Vision perceptually restores auditory spectral dynamics in speech.
    Plass J; Brang D; Suzuki S; Grabowecky M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jul; 117(29):16920-16927. PubMed ID: 32632010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
    O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How visual cues to speech rate influence speech perception.
    Bosker HR; Peeters D; Holler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1523-1536. PubMed ID: 32160814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():92-102. PubMed ID: 29398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.
    Peelle JE; Sommers MS
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():169-81. PubMed ID: 25890390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical and perceptual factors shape the neural mechanisms that integrate audiovisual signals in speech comprehension.
    Lee H; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 31(31):11338-50. PubMed ID: 21813693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mouth and Voice: A Relationship between Visual and Auditory Preference in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 28179553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 18003867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
    Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MEG Activity in Visual and Auditory Cortices Represents Acoustic Speech-Related Information during Silent Lip Reading.
    Bröhl F; Keitel A; Kayser C
    eNeuro; 2022; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 35728955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2063-73. PubMed ID: 10530029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
    Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.