233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32632784)
1. Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles.
Dubljević V
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2461-2472. PubMed ID: 32632784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.
Dubljević V; Sattler S; Racine E
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204631. PubMed ID: 30273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cooperative behavior in the workplace: Empirical evidence from the agent-deed-consequences model of moral judgment.
Sattler S; Dubljević V; Racine E
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1064442. PubMed ID: 36698601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.
Faulhaber AK; Dittmer A; Blind F; Wächter MA; Timm S; Sütfeld LR; Stephan A; Pipa G; König P
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):399-418. PubMed ID: 29357047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Should Autonomous Cars Drive? A Preference for Defaults in Moral Judgments Under Risk and Uncertainty.
Meder B; Fleischhut N; Krumnau NC; Waldmann MR
Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 30157299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Could We Know When a Robot was a Moral Patient?
Shevlin H
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):459-471. PubMed ID: 34109927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior.
Martin R; Kusev P; van Schaik P
Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104666. PubMed ID: 33930784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dopamine, religiosity, and utilitarian moral judgment.
Mueller D; Halfmann K
Soc Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 16(6):627-638. PubMed ID: 34461025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents.
Wallach W; Franklin S; Allen C
Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):454-85. PubMed ID: 25163872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A person-centered approach to moral judgment.
Uhlmann EL; Pizarro DA; Diermeier D
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25910382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the uneasy alliance between moral bioenhancement and utilitarianism.
Kudlek K
Bioethics; 2022 Feb; 36(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 34798678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AI Moral Enhancement: Upgrading the Socio-Technical System of Moral Engagement.
Volkman R; Gabriels K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Mar; 29(2):11. PubMed ID: 36952140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment.
Millar JC; Turri J; Friedman O
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24972369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Puzzle of Evaluating Moral Cognition in Artificial Agents.
Reinecke MG; Mao Y; Kunesch M; Duéñez-Guzmán EA; Haas J; Leibo JZ
Cogn Sci; 2023 Aug; 47(8):e13315. PubMed ID: 37555649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics under uncertainty: the morality and appropriateness of utilitarianism when outcomes are uncertain.
Kortenkamp KV; Moore CF
Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(3):367-82. PubMed ID: 25588277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trust in Autonomous Cars: Exploring the Role of Shared Moral Values, Reasoning, and Emotion in Safety-Critical Decisions.
Yokoi R; Nakayachi K
Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1465-1484. PubMed ID: 32663047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?
Li MH; Rao LL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1308-1320. PubMed ID: 30698496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Once a Utilitarian, Consistently a Utilitarian? Examining Principledness in Moral Judgment via the Robustness of Individual Differences.
Helzer EG; Fleeson W; Furr RM; Meindl P; Barranti M
J Pers; 2017 Aug; 85(4):505-517. PubMed ID: 27037484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
