233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32632784)
21. Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.
Evans K; de Moura N; Chauvier S; Chatila R; Dogan E
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Dec; 26(6):3285-3312. PubMed ID: 33048325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Artificial Moral Agents: A Survey of the Current Status.
Cervantes JA; López S; Rodríguez LF; Cervantes S; Cervantes F; Ramos F
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):501-532. PubMed ID: 31721023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Switching Tracks? Towards a Multidimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology.
Everett JAC; Kahane G
Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 Feb; 24(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 31911126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.
Cohen DJ; Ahn M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1359-1381. PubMed ID: 27513303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Attributions toward artificial agents in a modified Moral Turing Test.
Aharoni E; Fernandes S; Brady DJ; Alexander C; Criner M; Queen K; Rando J; Nahmias E; Crespo V
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8458. PubMed ID: 38688951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
Gawronski B; Beer JS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Moral Enhancement Meets Normative and Empirical Reality: Assessing the Practical Feasibility of Moral Enhancement Neurotechnologies.
Dubljević V; Racine E
Bioethics; 2017 Jun; 31(5):338-348. PubMed ID: 28503833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial Intelligence in Service of Human Needs: Pragmatic First Steps Toward an Ethics for Semi-Autonomous Agents.
Rieder TN; Hutler B; Mathews DJH
AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32228385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Structural flexibility of moral judgment.
Krebs DL; Denton KL; Vermeulen SC; Carpendale JI; Bush A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Dec; 61(6):1012-23. PubMed ID: 1774624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revisiting the divide between deontology and utilitarianism in moral dilemma judgment: A multinomial modeling approach.
Hennig M; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 31478705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Research on the influence and mechanism of human-vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles.
Chen N; Zu Y; Song J
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1071872. PubMed ID: 37325750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.
Bartels DM; Pizarro DA
Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):154-61. PubMed ID: 21757191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology.
Sosa FA; Ullman T; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ; Gerstenberg T
Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104890. PubMed ID: 34487974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?
Gago B; Perea M; Sierra P; Livianos L; Cañada-Martínez A; García-Blanco A
J Affect Disord; 2019 Feb; 245():289-296. PubMed ID: 30419529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with differences in moral judgment.
Bernhard RM; Chaponis J; Siburian R; Gallagher P; Ransohoff K; Wikler D; Perlis RH; Greene JD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1872-1881. PubMed ID: 27497314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
