122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32632838)
21. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
Seo DG; Kim JK
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model.
Chen Y; Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):30-64. PubMed ID: 33751367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating three- and four-parameter MIRT models with importance-weighted sampling enhanced variational auto-encoder.
Liu T; Wang C; Xu G
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():935419. PubMed ID: 36046415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
Xue K; Bradshaw LP
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model and the General Diagnostic Model.
Chiu CY; Köhn HF
Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):585-610. PubMed ID: 27230079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Monte Carlo Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for sampling from distributions with intractable normalizing constants.
Liang F; Jin IH
Neural Comput; 2013 Aug; 25(8):2199-234. PubMed ID: 23607562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
Choi Y; Seo DG
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests.
Köhn HF; Chiu CY
Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Examining the Performance of the Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm in the Estimation of Multilevel Multidimensional IRT Models.
Bashkov BM; DeMars CE
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jul; 41(5):323-337. PubMed ID: 29881095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Exploring Multiple Strategic Problem Solving Behaviors in Educational Psychology Research by Using Mixture Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
Zhang J; Lu J; Yang J; Zhang Z; Sun S
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():568348. PubMed ID: 34149491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
Yu X; Cheng Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating the granularity coefficient of a Potts-Markov random field within a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.
Pereyra M; Dobigeon N; Batatia H; Tourneret JY
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jun; 22(6):2385-97. PubMed ID: 23475357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.
Yamaguchi K; Templin J
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1390-1421. PubMed ID: 35426059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
Akbay L; de la Torre J
Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.
Xu X; de la Torre J; Zhang J; Guo J; Shi N
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2260. PubMed ID: 33101108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative Analyses of MIRT Models and Software (BMIRT and flexMIRT).
Yavuz G; Hambleton RK
Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):263-274. PubMed ID: 29795913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
