These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32633497)

  • 21. Remote sensing and in situ measurements of methane and ammonia emissions from a megacity dairy complex: Chino, CA.
    Leifer I; Melton C; Tratt DM; Buckland KN; Clarisse L; Coheur P; Frash J; Gupta M; Johnson PD; Leen JB; Van Damme M; Whitburn S; Yurganov L
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():37-51. PubMed ID: 27993424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantification of landfill methane using modified Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's waste model and error function analysis.
    Govindan SS; Agamuthu P
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1005-14. PubMed ID: 25323145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methane emission estimation from landfills in Korea (1978-2004): quantitative assessment of a new approach.
    Kim HS; Yi SM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Jan; 59(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 19216190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of correction factors for landfill gas emission model suiting Indian condition to predict methane emission from landfills.
    Sil A; Kumar S; Wong JW
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 168():97-9. PubMed ID: 24685512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method.
    Mønster J; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():177-86. PubMed ID: 25442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Numerical simulations to assess the tracer dilution method for measurement of landfill methane emissions.
    Taylor DM; Chow FK; Delkash M; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():298-309. PubMed ID: 27395754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lessons learned from a UAV survey and methane emissions calculation at a UK landfill.
    Yong H; Allen G; Mcquilkin J; Ricketts H; Shaw JT
    Waste Manag; 2024 May; 180():47-54. PubMed ID: 38507836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Airborne Methane Emission Measurements for Selected Oil and Gas Facilities Across California.
    Mehrotra S; Faloona I; Suard M; Conley S; Fischer ML
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12981-12987. PubMed ID: 29019666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantification of multiple methane emission sources at landfills using a double tracer technique.
    Scheutz C; Samuelsson J; Fredenslund AM; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 21345664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of portable gas detector in point and scanning method to estimate spatial distribution of methane emission in landfill.
    Lando AT; Nakayama H; Shimaoka T
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():255-266. PubMed ID: 27815028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: Performance of various landfill gas emission models.
    Gollapalli M; Kota SH
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():174-180. PubMed ID: 29175479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement results.
    Mitchell AL; Tkacik DS; Roscioli JR; Herndon SC; Yacovitch TI; Martinez DM; Vaughn TL; Williams LL; Sullivan MR; Floerchinger C; Omara M; Subramanian R; Zimmerle D; Marchese AJ; Robinson AL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3219-27. PubMed ID: 25668106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fugitive halocarbon emissions from working face of municipal solid waste landfills in China.
    Liu Y; Lu W; Dastyar W; Liu Y; Guo H; Fu X; Li H; Meng R; Zhao M; Wang H
    Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():149-157. PubMed ID: 28917825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. California's methane super-emitters.
    Duren RM; Thorpe AK; Foster KT; Rafiq T; Hopkins FM; Yadav V; Bue BD; Thompson DR; Conley S; Colombi NK; Frankenberg C; McCubbin IB; Eastwood ML; Falk M; Herner JD; Croes BE; Green RO; Miller CE
    Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7781):180-184. PubMed ID: 31695210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guidelines for landfill gas emission monitoring using the tracer gas dispersion method.
    Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():351-360. PubMed ID: 30803590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differentiating and Mitigating Methane Emissions from Fugitive Leaks from Natural Gas Distribution, Historic Landfills, and Manholes in Montréal, Canada.
    Williams JP; Ars S; Vogel F; Regehr A; Kang M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):16686-16694. PubMed ID: 36375177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methane emissions from MBT landfills.
    Heyer KU; Hupe K; Stegmann R
    Waste Manag; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1853-60. PubMed ID: 23756351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of modeling with empirical calculation of diffuse and fugitive methane emissions in a Spanish landfill.
    Sánchez C; de la Fuente MDM; Narros A; Del Peso I; Rodríguez E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):362-372. PubMed ID: 30373487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory.
    Lan X; Talbot R; Laine P; Torres A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8139-46. PubMed ID: 26148552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Field Measurements to Methane Emissions Models at a New Landfill.
    De la Cruz FB; Green RB; Hater GR; Chanton JP; Thoma ED; Harvey TA; Barlaz MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(17):9432-41. PubMed ID: 27455372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.