These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32633816)

  • 1. Rethinking the Importance of the Individual within a Community of Data.
    Spector-Bagdady K; Beever J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Jul; 50(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 32633816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule.
    Sugarman J
    Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):22-26. PubMed ID: 28661754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trials and tribulations of navigating IRBs: anthropological and biomedical perspectives of "risk" in conducting human subjects research.
    Gordon EJ
    Anthropol Q; 2003; 76(2):299-320. PubMed ID: 15112685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group.
    Moreno J; Caplan AL; Wolpe PR
    JAMA; 1998 Dec; 280(22):1951-8. PubMed ID: 9851484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Exploration of the Protective Effects of Investigators' Ethical Awareness upon Subjects of Drug Clinical Trials in China.
    Zhang L; Huang XX; Chen HF
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 29230696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethical review of medical research: a social movement to protect the interests of research subjects.
    Osborne LW
    Aust J Soc Issues; 1984 Aug; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 11649620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research.
    McKinney RE; Beskow LM; Ford DE; Lantos JD; McCall J; Patrick-Lake B; Pletcher MJ; Rath B; Schmidt H; Weinfurt K
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 26374677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human subjects protection and cultural anthropology.
    Plattner S
    Anthropol Q; 2003; 76(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 15112684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protection of human subjects.
    United States
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel tightens rules on mental disorders.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5394):1617. PubMed ID: 9867656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why we need a national human experimentation agency.
    Annas GJ
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):293-302. PubMed ID: 11658184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
    Levine RJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioethics in the Oversight of Clinical Research: Institutional Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards.
    Grady C
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2019; 29(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 31080176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
    Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of the Revised Common Rule for Human Participant Research.
    DeRenzo EG; Moss J; Singer EA
    Chest; 2019 Feb; 155(2):272-278. PubMed ID: 30312589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.