163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32634262)
1. PTEN and ERG expression in MRI-ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer.
Erickson AM; Lokman U; Lahdensuo K; Tornberg S; Visapaa H; Bergroth R; Santti H; Petas A; Rannikko AS; Mirtti T
Prostate; 2020 Sep; 80(13):1118-1127. PubMed ID: 32634262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PTEN Loss but Not ERG Expression in Diagnostic Biopsies Is Associated with Increased Risk of Progression and Adverse Surgical Findings in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Lokman U; Erickson AM; Vasarainen H; Rannikko AS; Mirtti T
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):867-873. PubMed ID: 28753869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative change in Gleason score of prostate cancer in fusion targeted biopsy: a matched pair analysis.
Apfelbeck M; Tritschler S; Clevert DA; Buchner A; Chaloupka M; Kretschmer A; Herlemann A; Stief C; Schlenker B
Scand J Urol; 2021 Feb; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 33380254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PTEN and ERG detection in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.
Baumgartner E; Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena M; Eich ML; Porter KK; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S; Gordetsky J
Hum Pathol; 2019 Aug; 90():20-26. PubMed ID: 31075299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.
Kongnyuy M; Siddiqui MM; George AK; Muthigi A; Sidana A; Maruf M; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Sep; 20(3):348-351. PubMed ID: 28440325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associations of PTEN and ERG with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visibility and Assessment of Non-organ-confined Pathology and Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Eineluoto JT; Sandeman K; Pohjonen J; Sopyllo K; Nordling S; Stürenberg C; Malén A; Kilpeläinen TP; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Pellinen T; Järvinen P; Kenttämies A; Rannikko A; Mirtti T
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 32620540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.
Maruf M; Fascelli M; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Kongnyuy M; DiBianco JM; Muthigi A; Valayil S; Sidana A; Frye TP; Kilchevsky A; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 28220802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between Template Systematic Biopsies Obtained Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Machine and Freehand Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies.
Hoge C; Maynor S; Guan T; Naffouje R; Rao M; Verma S; Sidana A
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 32631097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adverse Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance-A Summary 7 Years after Introducing mpMRI-Guided Biopsy in a Real-World Setting.
Ebner B; Apfelbeck M; Pyrgidis N; Nellessen T; Ledderose S; Pfitzinger PL; Volz Y; Berg E; Enzinger B; Rodler S; Atzler M; Ivanova T; Clevert DA; Stief CG; Chaloupka M
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 36829741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.
Calio B; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Jain A; Maruf M; Xu S; Yan P; Kruecker J; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Dec; 20(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 28762373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
