These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32636056)

  • 1. Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; Kenworthy D; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 32636056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; Morris RW; Hibbs R; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e258-e263. PubMed ID: 32279922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of radiation dose to organs of neonatal patients during portable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Kim E; Park H; Kim K; Yoon Y; Lim C; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 35068414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
    Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Image Postprocessing in Digital Radiography to Detect Wooden, Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies.
    Kleinfelder TR; Ng CK
    Radiol Technol; 2022; 93(6):544-554. PubMed ID: 35790309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review of incubator-based neonatal radiography - What does the evidence say?
    Tugwell-Allsup J; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 32052784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
    Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging neonates within an incubator - A survey to determine existing working practice.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):e18-e23. PubMed ID: 31902464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Key Performance Indicators for Comparing the Performance of Portable Radiography: Direct Digital Radiography versus Conventional Machine Computed Radiography-A Study in a Nonacute Hospital.
    Ngan TL; Wong ET; Ng KL; Jeor PK; Law MY; Lo GG
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):105-114. PubMed ID: 31051940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.
    Al-Murshedi S; Peter Hogg ; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 32169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.
    Boissonnat G; Morichau-Beauchant P; Reshef A; Villa C; Désauté P; Simon AC
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1162-1184. PubMed ID: 36069636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the performance of digital x-ray systems in pelvis radiography.
    Jreije A; Krynke L; Gricienė B; Rimkus B; Dementavičienė J; Skovorodko K
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Jul; 44(3):. PubMed ID: 38950524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
    Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose.
    MacDougall RD; Kleinman PL; Yu L; Lee EY
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jul; 46(8):1114-9. PubMed ID: 26987734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing image quality and dose for digital radiography of distal pediatric extremities using the contrast-to-noise ratio.
    Hess R; Neitzel U
    Rofo; 2012 Jul; 184(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 22618480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues.
    Mutch SJ; Wentworth SD
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 80(959):902-10. PubMed ID: 17875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.