425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32636072)
21. Effect of at-home whitening strips on the surface roughness and color of a composite and an ormocer restorative material.
Gurbuz A; Ozkan P; Yilmaz K; Yilmaz B; Durkan R
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 22985354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials.
Guler AU; Kurt S; Kulunk T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 15867755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of a continuous mechanical polishing protocol on the color stainability, microhardness, mass, and surface roughness of denture base acrylic resin.
Melo CBF; Feitosa MD; Maia SDB; Barreto JO; Peixoto RF; Regis RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 34486976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro color and roughness stability of different temporary restorative materials.
Mickeviciute E; Ivanauskiene E; Noreikiene V
Stomatologija; 2016; 18(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 27649722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness.
Awad D; Stawarczyk B; Liebermann A; Ilie N
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 25749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of mechanical properties, surface roughness, and color stability of 3D-printed and conventional heat-polymerizing denture base materials.
Falahchai M; Ghavami-Lahiji M; Rasaie V; Amin M; Neshandar Asli H
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):266.e1-266.e8. PubMed ID: 37422420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites.
Lu H; Roeder LB; Lei L; Powers JM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(2):102-8; discussion 109. PubMed ID: 16036126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins.
Dede DÖ; Şahin O; Koroglu A; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 26922208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of different staining beverages on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins.
Karaman E; Tuncer D; Firat E; Ozdemir OS; Karahan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 25307814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of different surface treatment methods on the surface roughness and color stability of interim prosthodontic materials.
Köroğlu A; Sahin O; Dede DÖ; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 26723092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing.
Gantz L; Fauxpoint G; Arntz Y; Pelletier H; Etienne O
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):833.e1-833.e10. PubMed ID: 33685655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of coffee thermocycling on the surface roughness and stainability of nanographene-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate used for fixed definitive prostheses.
Çakmak G; Herren KV; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 36737355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of physicomechanical properties of milled versus 3D-printed denture base resins: A comparative in vitro study.
El Samahy MM; Abdelhamid AM; El Shabrawy SM; Hanno KI
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):797.e1-797.e7. PubMed ID: 37121625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Light-curing Units on Surface Microhardness and Color Change of Composite Resins after Challenge.
de A Souza MB; Briso AL; de Oliveira-Reis B; Dos Santos PH; Fagundes TC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Feb; 20(2):204-210. PubMed ID: 31058636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
