These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32637602)

  • 1. Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models.
    Meehl GA; Senior CA; Eyring V; Flato G; Lamarque JF; Stouffer RJ; Taylor KE; Schlund M
    Sci Adv; 2020 Jun; 6(26):eaba1981. PubMed ID: 32637602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved representation of atmospheric dynamics in CMIP6 models removes climate sensitivity dependence on Hadley cell climatological extent.
    De B; Tselioudis G; Polvani LM
    Atmos Sci Lett; 2022 Mar; 23(3):e1073. PubMed ID: 35859939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6.
    Zhu H; Jiang Z; Li L
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2021 Dec; 66(24):2528-2537. PubMed ID: 36654212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles.
    Seneviratne SI; Hauser M
    Earths Future; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e2019EF001474. PubMed ID: 33043069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6.
    Séférian R; Berthet S; Yool A; Palmiéri J; Bopp L; Tagliabue A; Kwiatkowski L; Aumont O; Christian J; Dunne J; Gehlen M; Ilyina T; John JG; Li H; Long MC; Luo JY; Nakano H; Romanou A; Schwinger J; Stock C; Santana-Falcón Y; Takano Y; Tjiputra J; Tsujino H; Watanabe M; Wu T; Wu F; Yamamoto A
    Curr Clim Change Rep; 2020; 6(3):95-119. PubMed ID: 32837849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations.
    Fyfe JC; Kharin VV; Santer BD; Cole JNS; Gillett NP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34074753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models.
    Tokarska KB; Stolpe MB; Sippel S; Fischer EM; Smith CJ; Lehner F; Knutti R
    Sci Adv; 2020 Mar; 6(12):eaaz9549. PubMed ID: 32206725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Greater Greenland Ice Sheet contribution to global sea level rise in CMIP6.
    Hofer S; Lang C; Amory C; Kittel C; Delhasse A; Tedstone A; Fettweis X
    Nat Commun; 2020 Dec; 11(1):6289. PubMed ID: 33323939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intercomparison of global terrestrial carbon fluxes estimated by MODIS and Earth system models.
    Hu Q; Li T; Deng X; Wu T; Zhai P; Huang D; Fan X; Zhu Y; Lin Y; Xiao X; Chen X; Zhao X; Wang L; Qin Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 810():152231. PubMed ID: 34896141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sea-surface temperature pattern effects have slowed global warming and biased warming-based constraints on climate sensitivity.
    Armour KC; Proistosescu C; Dong Y; Hahn LC; Blanchard-Wrigglesworth E; Pauling AG; Jnglin Wills RC; Andrews T; Stuecker MF; Po-Chedley S; Mitevski I; Forster PM; Gregory JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(12):e2312093121. PubMed ID: 38466843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming.
    Carvalho D; Rafael S; Monteiro A; Rodrigues V; Lopes M; Rocha A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11983. PubMed ID: 35835803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6.
    Nowicki SMJ; Payne T; Larour E; Seroussi H; Goelzer H; Lipscomb W; Gregory J; Abe-Ouchi A; Shepherd A
    Geosci Model Dev; 2016; 9(12):4521-4545. PubMed ID: 29697697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming.
    Friedrich T; Timmermann A; Tigchelaar M; Elison Timm O; Ganopolski A
    Sci Adv; 2016 Nov; 2(11):e1501923. PubMed ID: 28861462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 and +2.0 °C Worlds: HAPPI Projections and AgMIP Modeling Scenarios.
    Ruane AC; Phillips MM; Rosenzweig C
    Agric For Meteorol; 2018 Sep; 259():329-344. PubMed ID: 30880854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observational evidence that cloud feedback amplifies global warming.
    Ceppi P; Nowack P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(30):. PubMed ID: 34282010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced simulated early 21st century Arctic sea ice loss due to CMIP6 biomass burning emissions.
    DeRepentigny P; Jahn A; Holland MM; Kay JE; Fasullo J; Lamarque JF; Tilmes S; Hannay C; Mills MJ; Bailey DA; Barrett AP
    Sci Adv; 2022 Jul; 8(30):eabo2405. PubMed ID: 35895816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. network-based constraint to evaluate climate sensitivity.
    Ricard L; Falasca F; Runge J; Nenes A
    Nat Commun; 2024 Aug; 15(1):6942. PubMed ID: 39138144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear interactions of land carbon cycle feedbacks in Earth System Models.
    Huang Y; Wang YP; Ziehn T
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Jan; 28(1):296-306. PubMed ID: 34687116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of trends in the Hadley circulation between CMIP6 and CMIP5.
    Xia Y; Hu Y; Liu J
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2020 Oct; 65(19):1667-1674. PubMed ID: 36659043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6: characteristics, biases, and links to ENSO.
    McKenna S; Santoso A; Gupta AS; Taschetto AS; Cai W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11500. PubMed ID: 32661240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.