These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32638419)
1. Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model. Stephan S; Mayrhofer R; Waldmann MR Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 44(7):e12871. PubMed ID: 32638419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preemption in Singular Causation Judgments: A Computational Model. Stephan S; Waldmann MR Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):242-257. PubMed ID: 29152883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments. Stephan S; Waldmann MR Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104924. PubMed ID: 34673301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causality in medicine: towards a theory and terminology. Rizzi DA; Pedersen SA Theor Med; 1992 Sep; 13(3):233-54. PubMed ID: 1492339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment. White PA Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A counterfactual simulation model of causation by omission. Gerstenberg T; Stephan S Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104842. PubMed ID: 34303272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence and gradation in causal judgment. O'Neill K; Henne P; Bello P; Pearson J; De Brigard F Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105036. PubMed ID: 35092903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Causal Networks or Causal Islands? The Representation of Mechanisms and the Transitivity of Causal Judgment. Johnson SG; Ahn WK Cogn Sci; 2015 Sep; 39(7):1468-503. PubMed ID: 25556901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When do we think that X caused Y? Quillien T Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104410. PubMed ID: 32768136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events. Gerstenberg T; Goodman ND; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):936-975. PubMed ID: 34096754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Norms Affect Prospective Causal Judgments. Henne P; O'Neill K; Bello P; Khemlani S; De Brigard F Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 33415814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Counterfactual thinking and recency effects in causal judgment. Henne P; Kulesza A; Perez K; Houcek A Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104708. PubMed ID: 33819848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes. Tangen JM; Allan LG Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From covariation to causation: a test of the assumption of causal power. Buehner MJ; Cheng PW; Clifford D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1119-40. PubMed ID: 14622051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Development of Spatial-Temporal, Probability, and Covariation Information to Infer Continuous Causal Processes. Dündar-Coecke S; Tolmie A; Schlottmann A Front Psychol; 2021; 12():525195. PubMed ID: 33746808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasoning about actual causation in reversible and irreversible causal structures. Stephan S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38709618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]