These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32639154)

  • 1. DUBS: A Framework for Developing
    Fine J; Muhoberac M; Fraux G; Chopra G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4137-4143. PubMed ID: 32639154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lemon: a framework for rapidly mining structural information from the Protein Data Bank.
    Fine J; Chopra G
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(20):4165-4167. PubMed ID: 30873531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MUBD-DecoyMaker 2.0: A Python GUI Application to Generate Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Virtual Drug Screening.
    Xia J; Li S; Ding Y; Wu S; Wang XS
    Mol Inform; 2020 Apr; 39(4):e1900151. PubMed ID: 31828959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.
    Xia J; Tilahun EL; Reid TE; Zhang L; Wang XS
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 71():146-57. PubMed ID: 25481478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual decoy sets for molecular docking benchmarks.
    Wallach I; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 21207928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Community benchmarks for virtual screening.
    Irwin JJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008; 22(3-4):193-9. PubMed ID: 18273555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An unbiased method to build benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening and its application to GPCRs.
    Xia J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L; Wang XS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1433-50. PubMed ID: 24749745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a benchmarking data set able to evaluate ligand- and structure-based virtual screening using public HTS data.
    Lindh M; Svensson F; Schaal W; Zhang J; Sköld C; Brandt P; Karlén A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 25564966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbench: automated metadata management for systems biology benchmarking and reproducibility in Python.
    Lubbock ALR; Lopez CF
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 38(20):4823-4825. PubMed ID: 36000837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Chemokine Receptors and Comparative Analysis.
    Xia J; Reid TE; Wu S; Zhang L; Wang XS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1104-1120. PubMed ID: 29698608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PMLB v1.0: an open-source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methods.
    Romano JD; Le TT; La Cava W; Gregg JT; Goldberg DJ; Chakraborty P; Ray NL; Himmelstein D; Fu W; Moore JH
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(3):878-880. PubMed ID: 34677586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. mRAISE: an alternative algorithmic approach to ligand-based virtual screening.
    von Behren MM; Bietz S; Nittinger E; Rarey M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Aug; 30(8):583-94. PubMed ID: 27565795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking Data Sets for the Evaluation of Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Review and Perspectives.
    Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1297-307. PubMed ID: 26038804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benchmark on Indexing Algorithms for Accelerating Molecular Similarity Search.
    Zhu CJ; Song M; Liu Q; Becquey C; Bi J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6167-6184. PubMed ID: 33095006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of New Methods Needs Proper Evaluation-Benchmarking Sets for Machine Learning Experiments for Class A GPCRs.
    Leśniak D; Podlewska S; Jastrzębski S; Sieradzki I; Bojarski AJ; Tabor J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Dec; 59(12):4974-4992. PubMed ID: 31604014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PyRMD: A New Fully Automated AI-Powered Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Tool.
    Amendola G; Cosconati S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Aug; 61(8):3835-3845. PubMed ID: 34270903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a Field-Based Ligand Screener Using a Novel Benchmarking Data Set for Assessing 3D-Based Virtual Screening Methods.
    Giangreco I; Mukhopadhyay A; Cole JC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):5841-5852. PubMed ID: 34792345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ShinyLearner: A containerized benchmarking tool for machine-learning classification of tabular data.
    Piccolo SR; Lee TJ; Suh E; Hill K
    Gigascience; 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32249316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. REPROVIS-DB: a benchmark system for ligand-based virtual screening derived from reproducible prospective applications.
    Ripphausen P; Wassermann AM; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2467-73. PubMed ID: 21902278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PyRod: Tracing Water Molecules in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Schaller D; Pach S; Wolber G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2818-2829. PubMed ID: 31117512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.