144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32639898)
1. Do we need empirical research on the use of trolley dilemmas in applied ethics? Reply to commentary by Heidi Matisonn.
Oftedal G; Ravn IH; Dahl FA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):300-301. PubMed ID: 32639898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Trolley Dilemmas Fail to Predict Ethical Judgment in a Hypothetical Vaccination Context.
Dahl FA; Oftedal G
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Feb; 14(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 30382789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Invited Commentary on "No Correlation Between Ethical Judgment in Trolley Dilemmas and Vaccine Scenarios for Nurse Specialist Students".
Matisonn H
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):298-299. PubMed ID: 32578490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Social (not fiscal) conservatism predicts deontological ethics.
Chan EY
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102867. PubMed ID: 31234036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
Gawronski B; Beer JS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No Correlation Between Ethical Judgment in Trolley Dilemmas and Vaccine Scenarios for Nurse Specialist Students.
Oftedal G; Ravn IH; Dahl FA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):292-297. PubMed ID: 32189547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas.
Bostyn DH; Sevenhant S; Roets A
Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1084-1093. PubMed ID: 29741993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who is deontological? Completing moral dilemmas in front of mirrors increases deontological but not utilitarian response tendencies.
Reynolds CJ; Knighten KR; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103993. PubMed ID: 31229738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies.
de Vries R; Gordijn B
Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 19338520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
Byrd N; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?
Li MH; Rao LL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1308-1320. PubMed ID: 30698496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment.
Millar JC; Turri J; Friedman O
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24972369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics.
Hoffmaster B
Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29280167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overlooked Evidence and a Misunderstanding of What Trolley Dilemmas Do Best: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
Plunkett D; Greene JD
Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1389-1391. PubMed ID: 31361577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
