219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32639950)
1. Relationship between the expression of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and
Wu C; Chen R; Xu L; Chen Y; Wang Y; Huang G; Liu J
Aging (Albany NY); 2020 Jul; 12(13):12921-12929. PubMed ID: 32639950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between PD-L1 expression and
Chen R; Chen Y; Huang G; Liu J
Aging (Albany NY); 2019 Dec; 11(24):12270-12277. PubMed ID: 31848322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of estrogen, progesterone, and C-erbB-2 receptor states on 18F-FDG uptake of primary breast cancer lesions.
Mavi A; Cermik TF; Urhan M; Puskulcu H; Basu S; Yu JQ; Zhuang H; Czerniecki B; Alavi A
J Nucl Med; 2007 Aug; 48(8):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17631558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of
Nguyen A; Fullard K; Sheehan-Dare G; Tang R; Chan L; Ho B; Dear R; Keane J; Hickey A; Nandurkar R; Chen J; Chen A; Lim E; Emmett L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Sep; 66(6):731-737. PubMed ID: 34676675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined
Wu J; Zhang X; Jia Z; Zhou X; Qi R; Ji H; Sun J; Sun C; Teng Z; Lu G; Chen X
Mol Pharm; 2022 Sep; 19(9):3405-3411. PubMed ID: 35972444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET correlates with histological grade in endometrial cancer.
Nakamura K; Kodama J; Okumura Y; Hongo A; Kanazawa S; Hiramatsu Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jan; 20(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 20130510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.
Wang CL; MacDonald LR; Rogers JV; Aravkin A; Haseley DR; Beatty JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W247-55. PubMed ID: 21785049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of preoperative
Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of the value of 18F-FDG uptake, described by SUVmax, SUVavg, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, to clinicopathological prognostic factors and biological subtypes in breast cancer.
Kajáry K; Tőkés T; Dank M; Kulka J; Szakáll S; Lengyel Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jan; 36(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 25299471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumour 18 F-FDG Uptake on preoperative PET/CT may predict axillary lymph node metastasis in ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes.
Kim JY; Lee SH; Kim S; Kang T; Bae YT
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1172-81. PubMed ID: 25298170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of
Ravina M; Saboury B; Chauhan MS; Jacob MJ; Pandit AG; Sanchety N; Werner TJ; Alavi A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(3):165-171. PubMed ID: 31587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Journal Club: Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in predicting the clinicopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Sugie T; Mikami Y; Toi M; Togashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 25055259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Paquette M; Espinosa-Bentancourt E; Lavallée É; Phoenix S; Lapointe-Milot K; Bessette P; Guérin B; Turcotte ÉE
J Nucl Med; 2022 May; 63(5):702-707. PubMed ID: 34413142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
