148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640200)
1. Side-by-side comparison of next-generation sequencing, cytology, and histology in diagnosing locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Carrara S; Soldà G; Di Leo M; Rahal D; Peano C; Giunta M; Lamonaca L; Auriemma F; Anderloni A; Fugazza A; Maselli R; Malesci A; Laghi L; Repici A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Mar; 93(3):597-604.e5. PubMed ID: 32640200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Successful Next-Generation Sequencing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Park JK; Lee JH; Noh DH; Park JK; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH; Jang KT; Cho J
Gut Liver; 2020 May; 14(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 31581388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations for Pancreatic Cancer in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspirates with Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications from a Prospective Cohort Study.
Habib JR; Zhu Y; Yin L; Javed AA; Ding D; Tenior J; Wright M; Ali SZ; Burkhart RA; Burns W; Wolfgang CL; Shin E; Yu J; He J
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Dec; 25(12):3149-3159. PubMed ID: 34244950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeted next generation sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound acquired cytology from ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma has the potential to aid patient stratification for optimal therapy selection.
Gleeson FC; Kerr SE; Kipp BR; Voss JS; Minot DM; Tu ZJ; Henry MR; Graham RP; Vasmatzis G; Cheville JC; Lazaridis KN; Levy MJ
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(34):54526-54536. PubMed ID: 27203738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Routine Molecular Profiling in Both Resectable and Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Relevance of Cytologic Samples.
Redegalli M; Grassini G; Magliacane G; Pecciarini L; Schiavo Lena M; Smart CE; Johnston RL; Waddell N; Maestro R; Macchini M; Orsi G; Petrone MC; Rossi G; Balzano G; Falconi M; Arcidiacono PG; Reni M; Doglioni C; Cangi MG
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Oct; 21(11):2825-2833. PubMed ID: 36280101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Next-generation sequencing of residual cytologic fixative preserved DNA from pancreatic lesions: A pilot study.
Fulmer CG; Park K; Dilcher T; Ho M; Mirabelli S; Alperstein S; Hissong EM; Pittman M; Siddiqui M; Heymann JJ; Yantiss RK; Borczuk AC; Fernandes H; Sigel C; Song W; Mosquera JM; Rao R
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 128(11):840-851. PubMed ID: 32598087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy as a tool for studying the intra-tumoral microbiome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.
Chu CS; Yang CY; Yeh CC; Lin RT; Chen CC; Bai LY; Hung MC; Lin CC; Wu CY; Lin JT
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):107. PubMed ID: 34997106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. K-ras mutation analysis of residual liquid-based cytology specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves cell block diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Sekita-Hatakeyama Y; Nishikawa T; Takeuchi M; Morita K; Takeda M; Hatakeyama K; Nakai T; Uchiyama T; Itami H; Fujii T; Mitoro A; Sho M; Ohbayashi C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193692. PubMed ID: 29494669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Fuccio L; Hassan C; Laterza L; Correale L; Pagano N; Bocus P; Fabbri C; Maimone A; Cennamo V; Repici A; Costamagna G; Bazzoli F; Larghi A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 23660563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic profile concordance between pancreatic cyst fluid and neoplastic tissue.
Laquière AE; Lagarde A; Napoléon B; Bourdariat R; Atkinson A; Donatelli G; Pol B; Lecomte L; Curel L; Urena-Campos R; Helbert T; Valantin V; Mithieux F; Buono JP; Grandval P; Olschwang S
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 25(36):5530-5542. PubMed ID: 31576098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
Trisolini E; Armellini E; Paganotti A; Veggiani C; Bozzola C; Frattini M; Pizio C; Mancuso G; Andorno S; Boldorini R
Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing analysis of residual liquid-based cytology specimens of pancreatic masses.
Sekita-Hatakeyama Y; Fujii T; Nishikawa T; Mitoro A; Sawai M; Itami H; Morita K; Uchiyama T; Takeda M; Sho M; Yoshiji H; Hatakeyama K; Ohbayashi C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Mar; 130(3):202-214. PubMed ID: 34665935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macroscopic visible core length can predict the histological sample quantity in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: Multicenter prospective study.
Kaneko J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Yasuda I; Takahashi K; Imura J; Iwashita T; Uemura S; Hatano Y; Miyazaki T; Satoh T; Sato J; Ishikawa K
Dig Endosc; 2022 Mar; 34(3):622-631. PubMed ID: 34437732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.
Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M; Granata A; Curcio G; Azzopardi N; Baccarini P; Liotta R; Fornelli A; Maimone A; Jovine E; Cennamo V; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23916241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]