These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640553)

  • 21. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.
    Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
    Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Hussain FA; Mail N; Shamy AM; Suliman A; Saoudi A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 27167261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Proposal of a New Index Based on Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Low-contrast Detectability in Computed Tomographic Imaging].
    Hashimoto J; Abe S; Ishimori Y; Monma M; Tsumuraya A; Miyauchi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(7):537-547. PubMed ID: 28724865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image Quality Performance of Virtual Single-Source CT Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
    Alikhani B; Werner M; Jamali L; Wacker F; Werncke T
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30482627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving Image Quality of On-Board Cone-Beam CT in Radiation Therapy Using Image Information Provided by Planning Multi-Detector CT: A Phantom Study.
    Yang CC; Chen FL; Lo YC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157072. PubMed ID: 27280593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE.
    Shin JB; Yoon DK; Pak S; Kwon YH; Suh TS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 31729832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm.
    von Falck C; Hartung A; Berndzen F; King B; Galanski M; Shin HO
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 18340246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing radiation dose parameters in MDCT arthrography of the shoulder: illustration of basic concepts in a cadaveric study.
    Aguet J; Becce F; Dunet V; Vlassenbroek A; Coche EE; Omoumi P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 30725159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated development of the contrast-detail curve based on statistical low-contrast detectability in CT images.
    Anam C; Naufal A; Fujibuchi T; Matsubara K; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13719. PubMed ID: 35808971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical Value of Dual-energy CT in Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Investigation of the Best Pancreatic Tumor Contrast to Noise Ratio.
    He YL; Zhang DM; Xue HD; Jin ZY
    Chin Med Sci J; 2013 Jan; 27(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23294585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
    Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CT angiography in potential living kidney donors: 80 kVp versus 120 kVp.
    Davarpanah AH; Pahade JK; Cornfeld D; Ghita M; Kulkarni S; Israel GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W753-60. PubMed ID: 24147505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The combination of a reduction in contrast agent dose with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm in CT enterography: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng C; Zhu D; Zou X; Li A; Hu X; Li Z; Hu D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(12):e0151. PubMed ID: 29561422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction.
    Goenka AH; Herts BR; Dong F; Obuchowski NA; Primak AN; Karim W; Baker ME
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 26937709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improvement of low-contrast detectability in low-dose hepatic multidetector computed tomography using a novel adaptive filter: evaluation with a computer-simulated liver including tumors.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Miyazaki O; Nakayama Y; Goto T; Omi Y; Shimonobo T; Liu D; Yamashita Y; Hori S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16355033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative Image Quality and Histogram-Based Evaluations of an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm at Low-to-Ultralow Radiation Dose Levels: A Phantom Study in Chest CT.
    Lee KB; Goo HW
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 29354008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
    Buerke B; Allkemper T; Kugel H; Bremer C; Evers S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Tombach B
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.