171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640889)
1. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.
Bester C; Dalbert A; Collins A; Razmovski T; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):710-720. PubMed ID: 36550618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation.
Shaul C; Bester CW; Weder S; Choi J; Eastwood H; Padmavathi KV; Collins A; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 31083087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of electrophysiological parameters between perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes in paediatric cochlear implant users.
Zarowski A; Molisz A; Mylanus EAM; Miserus JHM; Leblans M; van Dinther J; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 277(10):2693-2699. PubMed ID: 32342198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Performance of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays.
Sturm JJ; Patel V; Dibelius G; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Apr; 42(4):532-539. PubMed ID: 33710993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.
Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.
De Ceulaer G; Johnson S; Yperman M; Daemers K; Offeciers FE; O'Donoghue GM; Govaerts PJ
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 14501455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.
Mussoi BS; Meibos A; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Dec; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38081181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
