These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640889)

  • 1. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.
    Mussoi BS; Meibos A; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Jan; 25(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 38081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
    Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
    Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.
    Bester C; Dalbert A; Collins A; Razmovski T; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):710-720. PubMed ID: 36550618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
    Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation.
    Shaul C; Bester CW; Weder S; Choi J; Eastwood H; Padmavathi KV; Collins A; O'Leary SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 31083087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of electrophysiological parameters between perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes in paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Zarowski A; Molisz A; Mylanus EAM; Miserus JHM; Leblans M; van Dinther J; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 277(10):2693-2699. PubMed ID: 32342198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Performance of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays.
    Sturm JJ; Patel V; Dibelius G; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Apr; 42(4):532-539. PubMed ID: 33710993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
    Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
    Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.
    Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.
    De Ceulaer G; Johnson S; Yperman M; Daemers K; Offeciers FE; O'Donoghue GM; Govaerts PJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 14501455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.