These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640889)

  • 21. Evaluation of Outcome Variability Associated With Lateral Wall, Mid-scalar, and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays When Controlling for Preoperative Patient Characteristics.
    Fabie JE; Keller RG; Hatch JL; Holcomb MA; Camposeo EL; Lambert PR; Meyer TA; McRackan TR
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):1122-1128. PubMed ID: 30106854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: Impedance changes over time with different cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Powell HR; Birman CS
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 26098963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual electrode stimulation using the nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies.
    Busby PA; Plant KL
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16230899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation.
    Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
    Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Reinsertion Effects Evaluated by Electrode Impedance.
    Toner FM; Sanli H; Hall AC; Birman CS
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jul; 41(6):e695-e699. PubMed ID: 32569245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Incomplete partition type III revisited-long-term results following cochlear implant. German version].
    Alballaa A; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Becker C; Hassepass F; Laszig R; Beck R; Speck I; Wesarg T; Ketterer MC
    HNO; 2019 Oct; 67(10):760-768. PubMed ID: 31485697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding.
    Vohra V; Andresen NS; Carver C; Dunham R; Marsiglia D; Yeagle J; Della Santina CC; Creighton FX; Bowditch SP; Sun DQ
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Feb; 45(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 38152035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrode Array Type and Its Impact on Impedance Fluctuations and Loss of Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implantation.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Buss E; Park LR; Pillsbury HC; O'Connell BP; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):186-191. PubMed ID: 31743293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S; Prins A; Wegner I; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Thomeer HGXM
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients.
    Tykocinski M; Cohen LT; Cowan RS
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):948-56. PubMed ID: 16151342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Observation on the change of electrode impedance and THR/MCL values in 20 cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ cochlear implant].
    Wu W; Jia H; Li Y; Tang Z; Huang Q; Yang J; Mei L; Haung Z; Wu H
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1238-42. PubMed ID: 24616980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of an impedance-based method to monitor the insertion of the electrode array during cochlear implantation.
    Gottfried TM; Galeazzi P; Föger A; Dejaco D; Tröger A; Fischer N; Innerhofer V; Di Trapani F; Weiss N; Seebacher J; Dierker A; Schmutzhard J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Aug; 281(8):4121-4131. PubMed ID: 38564010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation.
    Saoji AA; Adkins WJ; Olund AP; Graham M; Patel NS; Neff BA; Carlson ML; Driscoll CLW
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Nov; 59(11):881-888. PubMed ID: 32749178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal changes in impedance of implanted adults for various cochlear segments.
    Leone CA; Mosca F; Grassia R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2017 Aug; 37(4):312-319. PubMed ID: 28872161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements.
    Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Siebrecht M; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 33974777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.