445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32640992)
1. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
Sperrin M; Martin GP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.
Beesley LJ; Bondarenko I; Elliot MR; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Taylor JM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2685-2700. PubMed ID: 34643465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recoverability and estimation of causal effects under typical multivariable missingness mechanisms.
Zhang J; Dashti SG; Carlin JB; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M
Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2200326. PubMed ID: 38637322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple imputation for systematically missing confounders within a distributed data drug safety network: A simulation study and real-world example.
Secrest MH; Platt RW; Reynier P; Dormuth CR; Benedetti A; Filion KB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():35-44. PubMed ID: 31486165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dealing with missing delirium assessments in prospective clinical studies of the critically ill: a simulation study and reanalysis of two delirium studies.
Raman R; Chen W; Harhay MO; Thompson JL; Ely EW; Pandharipande PP; Patel MB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):97. PubMed ID: 33952189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Sisk R; Sperrin M; Peek N; van Smeden M; Martin GP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1461-1477. PubMed ID: 37105540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correcting bias due to missing stage data in the non-parametric estimation of stage-specific net survival for colorectal cancer using multiple imputation.
Falcaro M; Carpenter JR
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():16-21. PubMed ID: 28315607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imputation of Missing Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials with Continuous Outcomes: Simple, Unbiased and Efficient Methods.
Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 32(5):717-739. PubMed ID: 35041565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.
Lee KJ; Carlin JB
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 22695083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Principled Approach to Characterize and Analyze Partially Observed Confounder Data from Electronic Health Records.
Weberpals J; Raman SR; Shaw PA; Lee H; Russo M; Hammill BG; Toh S; Connolly JG; Dandreo KJ; Tian F; Liu W; Li J; Hernández-Muñoz JJ; Glynn RJ; Desai RJ
Clin Epidemiol; 2024; 16():329-343. PubMed ID: 38798915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Dashti SG; Lee KJ; Simpson JA; White IR; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M
Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38400653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data.
Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM
Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: including a collider as an auxiliary variable in the imputation model can induce bias.
Curnow E; Tilling K; Heron JE; Cornish RP; Carpenter JR
Front Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 3():1237447. PubMed ID: 37974561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanism-aware imputation: a two-step approach in handling missing values in metabolomics.
Dekermanjian JP; Shaddox E; Nandy D; Ghosh D; Kechris K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 35578165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
