243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32643466)
41. Assistant Personal Robot (APR): Conception and Application of a Tele-Operated Assisted Living Robot.
Clotet E; Martínez D; Moreno J; Tresanchez M; Palacín J
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Apr; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 27136552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Persuasive robots should avoid authority: The effects of formal and real authority on persuasion in human-robot interaction.
Saunderson SP; Nejat G
Sci Robot; 2021 Sep; 6(58):eabd5186. PubMed ID: 34550717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care.
Abdi J; Al-Hindawi A; Ng T; Vizcaychipi MP
BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018815. PubMed ID: 29440212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care.
Law M; Sutherland C; Ahn HS; MacDonald BA; Peri K; Johanson DL; Vajsakovic DS; Kerse N; Broadbent E
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031937. PubMed ID: 31551392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impaired perception of a partner's synchronizing behavior reduces positive attitude toward humanoid robot in schizophrenia patients.
Lozano-Goupil J; Marin L; Aubin L; Decombe A; Serré H; Capdevielle D; Mostafaoui G; Raffard S
Schizophr Res; 2024 Feb; 264():511-518. PubMed ID: 38290376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Technical Development of the CeCi Social Robot.
Flores-Vázquez C; Angulo C; Vallejo-Ramírez D; Icaza D; Pulla Galindo S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Classifying a Person's Degree of Accessibility From Natural Body Language During Social Human-Robot Interactions.
McColl D; Jiang C; Nejat G
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Feb; 47(2):524-538. PubMed ID: 26890942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. An Automated Planning Model for HRI: Use Cases on Social Assistive Robotics.
Fuentetaja R; García-Olaya A; García J; González JC; Fernández F
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33202674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. High level functions for the intuitive use of an assistive robot.
Lebec O; Ben Ghezala MW; Leynart V; Laffont I; Fattal C; Devilliers L; Chastagnol C; Martin JC; Mezouar Y; Korrapatti H; Dupourqué V; Leroux C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650374. PubMed ID: 24187193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Expectations vs. actual behavior of a social robot: An experimental investigation of the effects of a social robot's interaction skill level and its expected future role on people's evaluations.
Horstmann AC; Krämer NC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238133. PubMed ID: 32822438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of the therapeutic interaction provided by a humanoid robot serving stroke survivors as a therapeutic assistant for arm rehabilitation.
Platz T; Pedersen AL; Deutsch P; Umlauft AN; Bader S
Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1103017. PubMed ID: 36950283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Promoting Interactions Between Humans and Robots Using Robotic Emotional Behavior.
Ficocelli M; Terao J; Nejat G
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Dec; 46(12):2911-2923. PubMed ID: 26552105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Usability study of a smart transfer-assistive robot with dual arms for care workers.
Kim YS; Shin HR; Yoon HJ; Ban SW; Kim YG; Jung KW; In H
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 19(5):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 38019053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A biologically inspired decision-making system for the autonomous adaptive behavior of social robots.
Maroto-Gómez M; Castro-González Á; Malfaz M; Salichs MÁ
Complex Intell Systems; 2023 May; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 37361968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Technical Feasibility of Supervision of Stretching Exercises by a Humanoid Robot Coach for Chronic Low Back Pain: The R-COOL Randomized Trial.
Blanchard A; Nguyen SM; Devanne M; Simonnet M; Le Goff-Pronost M; Rémy-Néris O
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5667223. PubMed ID: 35309176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: the role of social robot engagement.
Ke C; Lou VW; Tan KC; Wai MY; Chan LL
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104241. PubMed ID: 32739611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Experiences of a Motivational Interview Delivered by a Robot: Qualitative Study.
Galvão Gomes da Silva J; Kavanagh DJ; Belpaeme T; Taylor L; Beeson K; Andrade J
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e116. PubMed ID: 29724701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. FriWalk robotic walker: usability, acceptance and UX evaluation after a pilot study in a real environment.
Pérez-Rodríguez R; Moreno-Sánchez PA; Valdés-Aragonés M; Oviedo-Briones M; Divan S; García-Grossocordón N; Rodríguez-Mañas L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31172819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. AMiCUS-A Head Motion-Based Interface for Control of an Assistive Robot.
Rudigkeit N; Gebhard M
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 31242706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
