These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32644827)

  • 1. Correlations between objective measurements and subjective evaluations of facial profile after orthodontic treatment.
    He D; Gu Y; Sun Y
    J Int Med Res; 2020 Jul; 48(7):300060520936854. PubMed ID: 32644827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Zou B; Zhou Y; Lowe AA; Li H; Pliska B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26439521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different incisor movements on the soft tissue profile measured in reference to a rough-surfaced palatal implant.
    Kuhn M; Markic G; Doulis I; Göllner P; Patcas R; Hänggi MP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 26926022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.
    Yogosawa F
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 2389852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction.
    Seben MP; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM; Cançado RH; Bittencourt Neto AC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):61-9. PubMed ID: 24262418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on Holdaway soft tissue measurements.
    Kiliç N; Kiki A; Oktay H; Erdem A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 18540012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anteroposterior relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white males.
    Adams M; Andrews W; Tremont T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e2-9. PubMed ID: 23646331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incisor retraction and profile changes in adult patients.
    Valentim ZL; Capelli Júnior J; Almeida MA; Bailey LJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8006481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.