166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32645030)
1. Evaluation of variant calling for cpn60 barcode sequence-based microbiome profiling.
Vancuren SJ; Dos Santos SJ; Hill JE;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235682. PubMed ID: 32645030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The chaperonin-60 universal target is a barcode for bacteria that enables de novo assembly of metagenomic sequence data.
Links MG; Dumonceaux TJ; Hemmingsen SM; Hill JE
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49755. PubMed ID: 23189159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing a PCR protocol for cpn60-based microbiome profiling of samples variously contaminated with host genomic DNA.
Johnson LA; Chaban B; Harding JC; Hill JE
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():253. PubMed ID: 26092180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resolution and Cooccurrence Patterns of Gardnerella leopoldii, G. swidsinskii, G. piotii, and G. vaginalis within the Vaginal Microbiome.
Hill JE; Albert AYK;
Infect Immun; 2019 Dec; 87(12):. PubMed ID: 31527125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection of marker genes for genetic barcoding of microorganisms and binning of metagenomic reads by Barcoder software tools.
Rotimi AM; Pierneef R; Reva ON
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 30165813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial profiling of cpn60 universal target sequences in artificial mixtures of vaginal bacteria sampled by nylon swabs or self-sampling devices under different storage conditions.
Schellenberg JJ; Oh AY; Hill JE
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 May; 136():57-64. PubMed ID: 28285169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. OTUX: V-region specific OTU database for improved 16S rRNA OTU picking and efficient cross-study taxonomic comparison of microbiomes.
Yadav D; Dutta A; Mande SS
DNA Res; 2019 Apr; 26(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 30624596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. mPUMA: a computational approach to microbiota analysis by de novo assembly of operational taxonomic units based on protein-coding barcode sequences.
Links MG; Chaban B; Hemmingsen SM; Muirhead K; Hill JE
Microbiome; 2013 Aug; 1(1):23. PubMed ID: 24451012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Shukla I; Hill JE
Can J Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 68(6):457-464. PubMed ID: 35230911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pyrosequencing of the chaperonin-60 universal target as a tool for determining microbial community composition.
Schellenberg J; Links MG; Hill JE; Dumonceaux TJ; Peters GA; Tyler S; Ball TB; Severini A; Plummer FA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 May; 75(9):2889-98. PubMed ID: 19270139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results.
Bukin YS; Galachyants YP; Morozov IV; Bukin SV; Zakharenko AS; Zemskaya TI
Sci Data; 2019 Feb; 6():190007. PubMed ID: 30720800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.
Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous profiling of seed-associated bacteria and fungi reveals antagonistic interactions between microorganisms within a shared epiphytic microbiome on Triticum and Brassica seeds.
Links MG; Demeke T; Gräfenhan T; Hill JE; Hemmingsen SM; Dumonceaux TJ
New Phytol; 2014 Apr; 202(2):542-553. PubMed ID: 24444052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species-level resolution for the vaginal microbiota with short amplicons.
Qing W; Shi Y; Chen R; Zou Y; Qi C; Zhang Y; Zhou Z; Li S; Hou Y; Zhou H; Chen M
mSystems; 2024 Feb; 9(2):e0103923. PubMed ID: 38275296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fungal DNA barcoding.
Xu J
Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):913-932. PubMed ID: 27829306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling.
Shvartsman E; Richmond MEI; Schellenberg JJ; Lamont A; Perciani C; Russell JNH; Poliquin V; Burgener A; Jaoko W; Sandstrom P; MacDonald KS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262355. PubMed ID: 35025956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metagenomics and Single-Cell Omics Data Analysis for Human Microbiome Research.
Han M; Yang P; Zhou H; Li H; Ning K
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 939():117-137. PubMed ID: 27807746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.
Ziesemer KA; Mann AE; Sankaranarayanan K; Schroeder H; Ozga AT; Brandt BW; Zaura E; Waters-Rist A; Hoogland M; Salazar-García DC; Aldenderfer M; Speller C; Hendy J; Weston DA; MacDonald SJ; Thomas GH; Collins MJ; Lewis CM; Hofman C; Warinner C
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16498. PubMed ID: 26563586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of cpn60 amplicon sequence variants.
Ren Q; Hill JE
ISME Commun; 2023 Jul; 3(1):77. PubMed ID: 37479852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
