BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32645056)

  • 1. Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Sandeman K; Eineluoto JT; Pohjonen J; Erickson A; Kilpeläinen TP; Järvinen P; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Marjasuo S; Kenttämies A; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235779. PubMed ID: 32645056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adding multiparametric MRI to the MSKCC and Partin nomograms for primary prostate cancer: Improving local tumor staging?
    Jansen BHE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Oprea-Lager DE; Yska MJ; Lont AP; van Moorselaar RJA; Vis AN
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e1-181.e6. PubMed ID: 30558983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head-to-head comparison between multiparametric MRI, the partin tables, memorial sloan kettering cancer center nomogram, and CAPRA score in predicting extraprostatic cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Zanelli E; Giannarini G; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Como G; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Girometti R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1604-1613. PubMed ID: 30957321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
    Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body
    Thalgott M; Düwel C; Rauscher I; Heck MM; Haller B; Gafita A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 29794224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
    Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Limited Incremental Value Over the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Preradical Prostatectomy Nomogram.
    Weaver JK; Kim EH; Vetter JM; Shetty A; Grubb RL; Strope SA; Andriole GL
    Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():119-128. PubMed ID: 29217354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy.
    Nyarangi-Dix J; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Hitthaler B; Schütz V; Dieffenbacher S; Mueller-Wolf M; Roth W; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Roethke M; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Nov; 6(6):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 30477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Incremental Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Staging before Radical Prostatectomy.
    Morlacco A; Sharma V; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Froemming AT; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):701-704. PubMed ID: 27576750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Diamand R; Ploussard G; Roumiguié M; Oderda M; Benamran D; Fiard G; Quackels T; Assenmacher G; Simone G; Van Damme J; Malavaud B; Iselin C; Descotes JL; Roche JB; Peltier A; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):180-185. PubMed ID: 33023770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Salvage Radiotherapy Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Sharma V; Nehra A; Colicchia M; Westerman ME; Kawashima A; Froemming AT; Kwon ED; Mynderse LA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):879-887. PubMed ID: 29195777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of MSKCC Preprostatectomy nomogram in men who undergo MRI-targeted prostate biopsy prior to radical prostatectomy.
    Glaser ZA; Gordetsky JB; Bae S; Nix JW; Porter KK; Rais-Bahrami S
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Dec; 37(12):970-975. PubMed ID: 31495569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: A potential biomarker for staging and prognosis.
    Kongnyuy M; Sidana A; George AK; Muthigi A; Iyer A; Ho R; Chelluri R; Mertan F; Frye TP; Su D; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):30.e1-30.e8. PubMed ID: 27567248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.
    Reisæter LAR; Fütterer JJ; Losnegård A; Nygård Y; Monssen J; Gravdal K; Halvorsen OJ; Akslen LA; Biermann M; Haukaas S; Rørvik J; Beisland C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 28986636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative PI-RADS Version 2 scores helps improve accuracy of clinical nomograms for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.
    Huang C; Song G; Wang H; Lin Z; Wang H; Ji G; Zhang S; Guo Y; Li J; Bao Z; Hong P; Du Y; Li P; He Q; He S; Gong Y; Wang X; Zhou L
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):116-126. PubMed ID: 31383954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score.
    Jambor I; Falagario U; Ratnani P; Perez IM; Demir K; Merisaari H; Sobotka S; Haines GK; Martini A; Beksac AT; Lewis S; Pahikkala T; Wiklund P; Nair S; Tewari A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 31566845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.