These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32645069)

  • 1. Use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making.
    Sarkar S; Shakarian P; Sanchez D; Armenta M; Lakkaraju K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0234875. PubMed ID: 32645069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
    Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental patterns of change in the influence of safe and risky peer choices on risky decision-making.
    Braams BR; Davidow JY; Somerville LH
    Dev Sci; 2019 Jan; 22(1):e12717. PubMed ID: 30105854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information about peer choices shapes human risky decision-making.
    Tomova L; Pessoa L
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5129. PubMed ID: 29651013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hanging Out With the Right Crowd: Peer Influence on Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescence.
    Van Hoorn J; Crone EA; Van Leijenhorst L
    J Res Adolesc; 2017 Mar; 27(1):189-200. PubMed ID: 28498538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.
    Yu H; Siegel JZ; Clithero JA; Crockett MJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104641. PubMed ID: 33740537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior.
    Vives ML; FeldmanHall O
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jun; 9(1):2156. PubMed ID: 29895948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compete, coordinate, and cooperate: How to exploit uncertain environments with social interaction.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):967-81. PubMed ID: 26413892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structured, uncertainty-driven exploration in real-world consumer choice.
    Schulz E; Bhui R; Love BC; Brier B; Todd MT; Gershman SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(28):13903-13908. PubMed ID: 31235598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty.
    Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():78-98. PubMed ID: 25868112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural mechanisms of sensitivity to peer information in young adult cannabis users.
    Gilman JM; Schuster RM; Curran MT; Calderon V; van der Kouwe A; Evins AE
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):646-61. PubMed ID: 27068178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development in uncertain contexts: An ecologically informed approach to understanding decision-making during adolescence.
    Conley MI; Baskin-Sommers A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):739-745. PubMed ID: 36737586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk Preferences in Surrogate Decision Making.
    Batteux E; Ferguson E; Tunney RJ
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):290-297. PubMed ID: 28922998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonconformist tendencies related to risky choices in female methamphetamine abstainers.
    Wei S; Liu Q; Harrington M; Sun J; Yu H; Han J; Hao M; Wu H; Liu X
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2020; 46(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 31120769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing evidence accumulation and rule learning in humans with an online game.
    Do Q; Li Y; Kane GA; McGuire JT; Scott BB
    J Neurophysiol; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 36475830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional diffusion processes in dynamic online networks.
    Easley D; Patacchini E; Rojas C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228421. PubMed ID: 32027659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Melioration as rational choice: sequential decision making in uncertain environments.
    Sims CR; Neth H; Jacobs RA; Gray WD
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):139-54. PubMed ID: 23230889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
    Schöbel M; Rieskamp J; Huber R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146536. PubMed ID: 26784448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.