BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32645503)

  • 1. Undercut macrostructure topography on and within an interbody cage improves biomechanical stability and interbody fusion.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier M; Wills D; Wang T; Bannigan S; Vizesi F
    Spine J; 2020 Nov; 20(11):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 32645503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses.
    McGilvray KC; Waldorff EI; Easley J; Seim HB; Zhang N; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 28751242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histologic evaluation of the efficacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion.
    Sandhu HS; Toth JM; Diwan AD; Seim HB; Kanim LE; Kabo JM; Turner AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 11884903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Wang T; Lovric V; Morberg P; Mobbs RJ
    Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1885-1898. PubMed ID: 31255790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bioabsorbable multiamino acid copolymer/α-tri-calcium phosphate interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Chunguang Z; Yueming S; Chongqi T; Hong D; Fuxing P; Yonggang Y; Hong L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1615-22. PubMed ID: 21270683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics.
    Pelletier MH; Cordaro N; Punjabi VM; Waites M; Lau A; Walsh WR
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):E208-14. PubMed ID: 22801456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.
    Kandziora F; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Schaefer J; Scholz A; Schmidmaier G; Schröder R; Bail H; Duda G; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):321-32. PubMed ID: 11990842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
    Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part II: Effect of growth factors and carrier systems on interbody fusion].
    Kandziora F; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Krummrey G; Schollmeier G; Schmidmaier G; Schnake KJ; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
    Chirurg; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1025-38. PubMed ID: 12395162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.