137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32646054)
1. Bioanalytical Performance of a New Particle-Enhanced Method for Measuring Procalcitonin.
Dupuy AM; Bargnoux AS; Larcher R; Merindol A; Masetto T; Badiou S; Cristol JP
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32646054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical evaluation of the novel VITROS BRAHMS procalcitonin immunoassay.
Dupuy AM; Bargnoux AS; Montagnon V; Kuster N; Badiou S; Cristol JP
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2020 Nov; 80(7):541-545. PubMed ID: 33124916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical evaluation of Diazyme procalcitonin (PCT) latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on Beckman Coulter AU5800.
Dipalo M; Buonocore R; Gnocchi C; Picanza A; Aloe R; Lippi G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 53(4):593-7. PubMed ID: 25536668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter comparison of automated procalcitonin immunoassays.
Dipalo M; Guido L; Micca G; Pittalis S; Locatelli M; Motta A; Bianchi V; Callegari T; Aloe R; Da Rin G; Lippi G
Pract Lab Med; 2015 Aug; 2():22-28. PubMed ID: 28932801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical evaluation of the performances of Diazyme and BRAHMS procalcitonin applied to Roche Cobas in comparison with BRAHMS PCT-sensitive Kryptor.
Ceriotti F; Marino I; Motta A; Carobene A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):162-169. PubMed ID: 28809746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical performances of a novel point-of-care procalcitonin assay.
Dupuy AM; Bargnoux AS; Andreeva A; Zins C; Kuster N; Badiou S; Cristol JP
Pract Lab Med; 2020 Jan; 18():e00145. PubMed ID: 31720356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a novel automated DiaSys procalcitonin immunoassay with four different BRAHMS-partnered immunoassays.
Eidizadeh A; Wiederhold M; Schnelle M; Binder L
Pract Lab Med; 2022 May; 30():e00274. PubMed ID: 35465623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytical evaluation of Lumipulse® BRAHMS PCT CLEIA assay and clinical performances in an unselected population as compared with central lab PCT assay.
Dupuy AM; Né M; Bargnoux AS; Badiou S; Cristol JP
Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 50(4-5):248-250. PubMed ID: 27838408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical Evaluation of the New Beckman Coulter Access Procalcitonin (PCT) Chemiluminescent Immunoassay.
Lippi G; Salvagno GL; Gelati M; Pucci M; Demonte D; Faggian D; Plebani M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32111028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comment to: Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor.
Masetto T; Grimmler M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jan; 62(2):e48-e50. PubMed ID: 37746855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-center comparison of 10 fully-automated commercial procalcitonin (PCT) immunoassays.
Lippi G; Salvagno GL; Gelati M; Pucci M; Lo Cascio C; Demonte D; Faggian D; Plebani M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Dec; 58(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31539351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply to: Analytical evaluation of the performances of Diazyme and BRAHMS procalcitonin applied to Roche Cobas in comparison with BRAHMS PCT-sensitive Kryptor.
Yuan C
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):e5-e6. PubMed ID: 29031019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Procalcitonin Assays on KRYPTOR and LIAISON
Dipalo M; Gnocchi C; Avanzini P; Musa R; Di Pietro M; Aloe R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2019 Aug; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 31398868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new sensitive automated assay for procalcitonin detection: LIAISON
Fortunato A
Pract Lab Med; 2016 Dec; 6():1-7. PubMed ID: 28856207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor.
Di Deo P; Vantaggiato C; Di Modugno A; Licari D; Savina PF; Zagliani A; Viganò C; Grimaldi G; Frassanito A; Lettera T; De Corato P; Ammirabile M; Ferraris Fusarini C; De Liso F; Maregnani A; Silvani I; Taverriti TPS; Ceriotti F; Vidali M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jan; 62(2):e44-e47. PubMed ID: 37531078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analytical evaluation of the novel Lumipulse G BRAHMS procalcitonin immunoassay.
Ruzzenente O; Salvagno GL; Gelati M; Lippi G
Pract Lab Med; 2016 Dec; 6():8-13. PubMed ID: 28856208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concordance of Three Automated Procalcitonin Immunoassays at Medical Decision Points.
Cho HW; Kim SH; Cho Y; Jeong SH; Lee SG
Ann Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 41(4):419-423. PubMed ID: 33536362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay for procalcitonin measurement on the Kryptor System.
Steinbach G; Rau B; Debard AL; Javourez JF; Bienvenu J; Ponzio A; Bonfà A; Hubl W; Demant T; Külpmann WR; Buchholz J; Schumann G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Apr; 42(4):440-9. PubMed ID: 15147156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National external quality assessment and direct method comparison reflect crucial deviations of Procalcitonin measurements in Germany.
Masetto T; Eidizadeh A; Peter C; Grimmler M
Clin Chim Acta; 2022 Apr; 529():67-75. PubMed ID: 35167843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical performances of PENIA and PETIA urinary cystatin C determination allow tubular injury investigation.
Bargnoux AS; Azoury V; Badiou S; Klouche K; Plawecki M; Kuster N; ; Cristol JP
Ann Clin Biochem; 2019 Mar; 56(2):228-231. PubMed ID: 30426761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
