These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32647224)

  • 1. Validation of a prognostic model for adverse perinatal health outcomes.
    Lagendijk J; Steyerberg EW; Daalderop LA; Been JV; Steegers EAP; Posthumus AG
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11243. PubMed ID: 32647224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An antenatal prediction model for adverse birth outcomes in an urban population: The contribution of medical and non-medical risks.
    Posthumus AG; Birnie E; van Veen MJ; Steegers EA; Bonsel GJ
    Midwifery; 2016 Jul; 38():78-86. PubMed ID: 26616215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient versus professional based psychosocial risk factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    Quispel C; van Veen MJ; Zuijderhoudt C; Steegers EA; Hoogendijk WJ; Birnie E; Bonsel GJ; Lambregtse-van den Berg MP
    Matern Child Health J; 2014 Nov; 18(9):2089-97. PubMed ID: 24585399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of score card-based antenatal risk selection, care pathways, and multidisciplinary consultation in the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study (HP4ALL): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Vos AA; van Voorst SF; Waelput AJ; de Jong-Potjer LC; Bonsel GJ; Steegers EA; Denktaş S
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():8. PubMed ID: 25559202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoea, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections among pregnant women and male partners in Dutch midwifery practices: prevalence, risk factors, and perinatal outcomes.
    Op de Coul ELM; Peek D; van Weert YWM; Morré SA; Rours I; Hukkelhoven C; de Jonge A; van Benthem B; Pereboom M
    Reprod Health; 2021 Jun; 18(1):132. PubMed ID: 34174905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: external validation of the IRIS algorithm.
    Kalafat E; Morales-Rosello J; Scarinci E; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(16):2775-2784. PubMed ID: 30563383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study.
    Lamain-de Ruiter M; Kwee A; Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot I; Evers IM; Groenendaal F; Hering YR; Huisjes AJ; Kirpestein C; Monincx WM; Siljee JE; Van 't Zelfde A; van Oirschot CM; Vankan-Buitelaar SA; Vonk MA; Wiegers TA; Zwart JJ; Franx A; Moons KG; Koster MP
    BMJ; 2016 Aug; 354():i4338. PubMed ID: 27576867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility and reliability of a newly developed antenatal risk score card in routine care.
    van Veen MJ; Birnie E; Poeran J; Torij HW; Steegers EA; Bonsel GJ
    Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 25194982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pregnancy outcomes in asylum seekers in the North of the Netherlands: a retrospective documentary analysis.
    Verschuuren AEH; Postma IR; Riksen ZM; Nott RL; Feijen-de Jong EI; Stekelenburg J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):320. PubMed ID: 32450845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
    Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
    Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study.
    de Jonge HC; Lagendijk J; Saha U; Been JV; Burdorf A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031357. PubMed ID: 31641003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of Prediction models for Risks of complications in Early-onset Pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study.
    Thangaratinam S; Allotey J; Marlin N; Mol BW; Von Dadelszen P; Ganzevoort W; Akkermans J; Ahmed A; Daniels J; Deeks J; Ismail K; Barnard AM; Dodds J; Kerry S; Moons C; Riley RD; Khan KS
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(18):1-100. PubMed ID: 28412995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between maternal HIV infection and perinatal outcome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    Brocklehurst P; French R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Aug; 105(8):836-48. PubMed ID: 9746375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting seizures in pregnant women with epilepsy: Development and external validation of a prognostic model.
    Allotey J; Fernandez-Felix BM; Zamora J; Moss N; Bagary M; Kelso A; Khan R; van der Post JAM; Mol BW; Pirie AM; McCorry D; Khan KS; Thangaratinam S
    PLoS Med; 2019 May; 16(5):e1002802. PubMed ID: 31083654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal factors.
    Benkő Z; Chaveeva P; de Paco Matallana C; Zingler E; Wright A; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):649-654. PubMed ID: 30887621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating risk of severe neonatal morbidity in preterm births under 32 weeks of gestation.
    Hamilton EF; Dyachenko A; Ciampi A; Maurel K; Warrick PA; Garite TJ
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 29886760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and internal validation of a multivariable model to predict perinatal death in pregnancy hypertension.
    Payne BA; Groen H; Ukah UV; Ansermino JM; Bhutta Z; Grobman W; Hall DR; Hutcheon JA; Magee LA; von Dadelszen P;
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2015 Oct; 5(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26597747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pregnancy induced hypertension on adverse perinatal outcomes in Tigray regional state, Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study.
    Berhe AK; Ilesanmi AO; Aimakhu CO; Mulugeta A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31892353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of antenatal risk scoring in a preterm birth prevention and perinatal loss.
    Talsania NJ; Lala MK
    Indian J Matern Child Health; 1994; 5(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12318798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.