610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32647937)
1. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive margins prediction in breast cancer conservative surgery: Assessment of a preoperative web-based nomogram.
Alves-Ribeiro L; Osório F; Amendoeira I; Fougo JL
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():167-73. PubMed ID: 27326978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical benefit of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins in breast conserving surgery.
Lee ES; Han W; Shin HC; Takada M; Ryu HS; Cho N; Kim MK; Kim J; Yoo TK; Moon HG; Toi M; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1169-75. PubMed ID: 27296727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Park SJ; Noh DY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22692386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A validated web-based nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery as a preoperative tool for clinical decision-making.
Pleijhuis RG; Kwast AB; Jansen L; de Vries J; Lanting R; Bart J; Wiggers T; van Dam GM; Siesling S
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 23462681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery.
Bae MS; Bernard-Davila B; Sung JS; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():171-177. PubMed ID: 31307644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery.
Agostinho JL; Zhao X; Sun W; Laronga C; Kiluk JV; Chen DT; Lee MC
Breast; 2015 Feb; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25466503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: Comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL).
Niinikoski L; Hukkinen K; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 31362135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-excision rate after sector resection for breast cancer: A 5-year retrospective cohort study.
Clement Z; McLeay W; Hoffmann C; Shin P; Chowdhry M; Eaton M
Breast Dis; 2019; 38(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 30198861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS.
Martins Maia C; Siderides C; Jaffer S; Weltz C; Cate S; Ahn S; Boolbol S; Ru M; Moshier E; Port E; Schmidt H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):3740-3748. PubMed ID: 35066720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.
Jones V; Linebarger J; Perez S; Gabram S; Okoli J; Bumpers H; Burns B; Mosunjac M; Rizzo M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 26254169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is higher dose radiation necessary for positive resection margin after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer?
Cho WK; Choi DH; Park W; Kim H; Cha H
Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():16-21. PubMed ID: 31265973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lin J; Lin KJ; Wang YF; Huang LH; Chen SL; Chen DR
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):451. PubMed ID: 32434493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
