340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32649502)
1. Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Induction of Labor in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Beninati MJ; Ramos SZ; Danilack VA; Has P; Savitz DA; Werner EF
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):402-410. PubMed ID: 32649502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for Cesarean delivery in pregnancy with small-for-gestational-age fetus undergoing induction of labor.
Nwabuobi C; Gowda N; Schmitz J; Wood N; Pargas A; Bagiardi L; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Kuznicki M; Sinkey R; Odibo A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 31441151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of vaginal delivery in medically indicated early preterm induction of labor.
Sievert RA; Kuper SG; Jauk VC; Parrish M; Biggio JR; Harper LM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):375.e1-375.e7. PubMed ID: 28526449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction.
Alavifard S; Meier K; Shulman Y; Tomlinson G; D'Souza R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):130. PubMed ID: 30991983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.
Ramos SZ; Lewkowitz AK; Lord MG; Has P; Danilack VA; Savitz DA; Werner EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):549.e1-549.e16. PubMed ID: 37290567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Externally Validated Prediction Model of Vaginal Delivery After Preterm Induction With Unfavorable Cervix.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Huang JC; Auguste TC; Bauer D; Overcash RT
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):716-724. PubMed ID: 32925613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting Vaginal Delivery in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor at Term.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Huang CC; Auguste TC; Bauer D; Overcash RT
Am J Perinatol; 2018 Jun; 35(7):660-668. PubMed ID: 29212131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in patients who undergo vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Luchristt D; Brown O; Pidaparti M; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Miller ES
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):173.e1-173.e8. PubMed ID: 33617798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator.
Saad AF; Gupta J; Hruban L; Hankins GD; Saade GR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():160-164. PubMed ID: 32028144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing Induction of Labor.
Rossi RM; Requarth E; Warshak CR; Dufendach KR; Hall ES; DeFranco EA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 135(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 32028500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables.
Prado CA; Araujo Júnior E; Duarte G; Quintana SM; Tonni G; Cavalli Rde C; Marcolin AC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26742573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening.
Jochum F; Le Ray C; Blanc-Petitjean P; Langer B; Meyer N; Severac F; Sananes N
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 134(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 31403585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Externally Validated Model to Predict Prolonged Induction of Labor with an Unfavorable Cervix.
Kawakita T; Saeed H; Huang JC
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e3140-e3146. PubMed ID: 37863073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction.
Danilack VA; Hutcheon JA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 May; 29(5):656-669. PubMed ID: 31657668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
