These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32649733)
1. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech. Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Wendt D; Alickovic E; Whitmer WM; Lunner T PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study. Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study. Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG. Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test. Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ? Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation. Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task. Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study. Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task. Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile. Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the Impact of Tinnitus on Aided Listening Effort Using Pupillary Response. Juul Jensen J; Callaway SL; Lunner T; Wendt D Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518795340. PubMed ID: 30205768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise. Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses. Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry. McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Sep; 161():95-112. PubMed ID: 28505505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]