BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32649755)

  • 1. Late follicular phase progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation is not associated with decreased implantation of chromosomally screened embryos in thaw cycles.
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Alkon-Meadows T; Luna-Rojas M; Mukherjee T; Copperman AB; Sandler B
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1889-1899. PubMed ID: 32649755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent clomiphene citrate exposure does not impact subsequent clinical outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles.
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee J; Alkon-Meadows T; Soto-Cossio L; Sandler B; Mukherjee T; Copperman A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1151-1161. PubMed ID: 37075318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individualised luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles based on serum progesterone levels: a prospective cohort study.
    Álvarez M; Gaggiotti-Marre S; Martínez F; Coll L; García S; González-Foruria I; Rodríguez I; Parriego M; Polyzos NP; Coroleu B
    Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 36(6):1552-1560. PubMed ID: 33686413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies.
    Irani M; Canon C; Robles A; Maddy B; Gunnala V; Qin X; Zhang C; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 32348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of letrozole co-treatment during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield, embryo development, and live birth rate in women with normal ovarian reserve: secondary outcomes from the RIOT trial.
    Bülow NS; Warzecha AK; Nielsen MV; Andersen CY; Holt MD; Petersen MR; Sopa N; Zedeler A; Englund AL; Pinborg A; Grøndahl ML; Skouby SO; Macklon NS
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2154-2165. PubMed ID: 37699851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
    Rodriguez-Purata J; Gingold J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Slifkin R; Briton-Jones C; Copperman A; Sandler B
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
    Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Colamaria S; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Venturella R; Alviggi E; Carmelo R; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 29912374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.
    Healy MW; Yamasaki M; Patounakis G; Richter KS; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27986817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is a freeze-all policy the optimal solution to circumvent the effect of late follicular elevated progesterone? A multicentric matched-control retrospective study analysing cumulative live birth rate in 942 non-elective freeze-all cycles.
    Racca A; Vanni VS; Somigliana E; Reschini M; Viganò P; Santos-Ribeiro S; Drakopoulos P; Tournaye H; Verheyen G; Papaleo E; Candiani M; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 34223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Martinez F; Clua E; Roca M; Garcia S; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2777-2786. PubMed ID: 36269092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles.
    Romanski PA; Bortoletto P; Liu YL; Chung PH; Rosenwaks Z
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):1932-1940. PubMed ID: 34128044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance.
    Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.
    Massin N; Abdennebi I; Porcu-Buisson G; Chevalier N; Descat E; Piétin-Vialle C; Goro S; Brussieux M; Pinto M; Pasquier M; Bry-Gauillard H
    Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):927-937. PubMed ID: 36864699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.
    Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Vidal MDM; Martínez F; Rodríguez I; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1098-1104. PubMed ID: 38498835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 76.