282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32650080)
1. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3-dimensionally printed patient-specific glenoid drill guides vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Dasari SP; Menendez ME; Espinoza Orias A; Khan ZA; Vadhera AS; Ebersole JW; White GM; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Nicholson GP; Garrigues GE; Verma NN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; 33(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 37774830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.
Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):e398-e409. PubMed ID: 31353300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hsu CP; Wu CT; Chen CY; Lin SC; Hsu KY
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4065-4075. PubMed ID: 36445496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.
Schoch BS; Haupt E; Leonor T; Farmer KW; Wright TW; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 32586595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glenoid component placement accuracy in total shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative planning and standard instrumentation is not influenced by supero-inferior glenoid erosion.
Hagan DP; Hao KA; Hones KM; Srinivasan RC; Wright JO; Wright TW; Leonor T; Schoch BS; King JJ
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Oct; 33(7):3159-3165. PubMed ID: 37067536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in preoperative planning of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Rohrs E; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2610-2618. PubMed ID: 33190760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Larose G; Greene AT; Jung A; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6S):S39-S45. PubMed ID: 36681107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?
Erickson BJ; Chalmers PN; Denard P; Lederman E; Horneff G; Werner BC; Provencher MT; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 32544424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.
Guehring T; Navas L; Westrich J; Zimmerer A; Schmidt S; Barrientos M; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4763-4772. PubMed ID: 36705760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.
Chen X; Reddy AS; Kontaxis A; Choi DS; Wright T; Dines DM; Warren RF; Berhouet J; Gulotta LV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3090-3099. PubMed ID: 28948516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of patient-specific guided implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.
Verborgt O; Hachem AI; Eid K; Vuylsteke K; Ferrand M; Hardy P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):767-772. PubMed ID: 29505820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional measures of posterior bone loss and retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids predict the need for an augmented anatomic glenoid component.
Cronin KJ; Kirsch JM; Gates S; Patel MS; Joyce CD; Hill BW; Gutman MJ; Williams GR; Namdari S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2386-2392. PubMed ID: 33753274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types.
Mohammad Sadeghi M; Kececi EF; Kapicioglu M; Aralasmak A; Tezgel O; Basaran MA; Yildiz F; Bilsel K
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(1):10225536221079432. PubMed ID: 35220811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Walker K; Rodriguez E; Patterson TE; Jun BJ; Ricchetti ET
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):446-457. PubMed ID: 30845039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
