These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32652339)

  • 1. No title, no theme: The joined neural space between speakers and listeners during production and comprehension of multi-sentence discourse.
    Heidlmayr K; Weber K; Takashima A; Hagoort P
    Cortex; 2020 Sep; 130():111-126. PubMed ID: 32652339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring speaker-listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy.
    Liu Y; Piazza EA; Simony E; Shewokis PA; Onaral B; Hasson U; Ayaz H
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43293. PubMed ID: 28240295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
    Guediche S; Reilly M; Santiago C; Laurent P; Blumstein SE
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():57-74. PubMed ID: 27100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the same wavelength: predictable language enhances speaker-listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus.
    Dikker S; Silbert LJ; Hasson U; Zevin JD
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(18):6267-72. PubMed ID: 24790197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Content-specific coordination of listeners' to speakers' EEG during communication.
    Kuhlen AK; Allefeld C; Haynes JD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():266. PubMed ID: 23060770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similar neural networks respond to coherence during comprehension and production of discourse.
    Morales M; Patel T; Tamm A; Pickering MJ; Hoffman P
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Sep; 32(19):4317-4330. PubMed ID: 35059718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study.
    Ferstl EC; Rinck M; von Cramon DY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):724-39. PubMed ID: 15904540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bridging gaps in common ground: Speakers design their gestures for their listeners.
    Hilliard C; Cook SW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 26120773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeners' adaptation to unreliable intonation is speaker-sensitive.
    Roettger TB; Rimland K
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104372. PubMed ID: 32615469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning.
    Bašnáková J; Weber K; Petersson KM; van Berkum J; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2572-8. PubMed ID: 23645715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension.
    Whitney C; Huber W; Klann J; Weis S; Krach S; Kircher T
    Neuroimage; 2009 Aug; 47(1):360-6. PubMed ID: 19376237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listeners' comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech.
    Tomlinson JM; Fox Tree JE
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21237451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.
    Stephens GJ; Silbert LJ; Hasson U
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Aug; 107(32):14425-30. PubMed ID: 20660768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes.
    Brothers T; Dave S; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107225. PubMed ID: 31605686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.
    van Berkum JJ; Zwitserlood P; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):701-18. PubMed ID: 14561457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners.
    Wegner ML; Brookshire RH; Nicholas LE
    Brain Lang; 1984 Jan; 21(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 6697170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
    Just MA; Newman SD; Keller TA; McEleney A; Carpenter PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jan; 21(1):112-24. PubMed ID: 14741648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.