247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32652986)
21. Next-generation sequencing in residual liquid-based cytology specimens for cancer genome analysis.
Yamaguchi T; Akahane T; Harada O; Kato Y; Aimono E; Takei H; Tasaki T; Noguchi H; Nishihara H; Kamata H; Tanimoto A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 48(11):965-971. PubMed ID: 32511899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Targeted deep sequencing of effusion cytology samples is feasible, informs spatiotemporal tumor evolution, and has clinical and diagnostic utility.
Leichsenring J; Volckmar AL; Kirchner M; Kazdal D; Kriegsmann M; Stögbauer F; Bockmayr T; Klauschen F; Herth FJF; Penzel R; Warth A; Schirmacher P; Endris V; Stenzinger A
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2018 Feb; 57(2):70-79. PubMed ID: 29044880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robustness of Next Generation Sequencing on Older Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue.
Carrick DM; Mehaffey MG; Sachs MC; Altekruse S; Camalier C; Chuaqui R; Cozen W; Das B; Hernandez BY; Lih CJ; Lynch CF; Makhlouf H; McGregor P; McShane LM; Phillips Rohan J; Walsh WD; Williams PM; Gillanders EM; Mechanic LE; Schully SD
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0127353. PubMed ID: 26222067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material.
Steeghs EMP; Kroeze LI; Tops BBJ; van Kempen LC; Ter Elst A; Kastner-van Raaij AWM; Hendriks-Cornelissen SJB; Hermsen MJW; Jansen EAM; Nederlof PM; Schuuring E; Ligtenberg MJL; Eijkelenboom A
BMC Cancer; 2020 Apr; 20(1):291. PubMed ID: 32264863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach.
Luchini C; Bibeau F; Ligtenberg MJL; Singh N; Nottegar A; Bosse T; Miller R; Riaz N; Douillard JY; Andre F; Scarpa A
Ann Oncol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1232-1243. PubMed ID: 31056702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical significance of multiple gene detection with a 22-gene panel in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of 207 colorectal cancer patients.
Gao XH; Yu GY; Hong YG; Lian W; Chouhan H; Xu Y; Liu LJ; Bai CG; Zhang W
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 30612269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Targeted gene sequencing of Lynch syndrome-related and sporadic endometrial carcinomas.
Libera L; Craparotta I; Sahnane N; Chiaravalli AM; Mannarino L; Cerutti R; Riva C; Marchini S; Furlan D
Hum Pathol; 2018 Nov; 81():235-244. PubMed ID: 30420047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Harmonized molecular classification; assessment of a single-test ProMisE NGS tool.
Jamieson A; McConechy MK; Lum A; Leung S; Thompson EF; Senz J; Talhouk A; Huntsman DG; Bashashati A; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 175():45-52. PubMed ID: 37321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimal Preservations of Cytological Materials Using Liquid-Based Cytology Fixatives for Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis.
Tanaka R; Fujiwara M; Nakazato Y; Arai N; Tachibana K; Sakamoto N; Kishimoto K; Kamma H; Shibahara J; Kondo H
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(5):457-465. PubMed ID: 35413709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study in China.
Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Bi Y; Lang J
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jul; 39(1):42. PubMed ID: 31307542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Molecular markers in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancers.
Moroney MR; Davies KD; Wilberger AC; Sheeder J; Post MD; Berning AA; Fisher C; Lefkowits C; Guntupalli SR; Behbakht K; Corr BR
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):517-520. PubMed ID: 30910249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High concordance of molecular tumor alterations between pre-operative curettage and hysterectomy specimens in patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Stelloo E; Nout RA; Naves LC; Ter Haar NT; Creutzberg CL; Smit VT; Bosse T
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 24556061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas.
Khode R; Larsen DA; Culbreath BC; Parrish S; Walker KL; Sayage-Rabie L; Beissner RS; Rao A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):361-9. PubMed ID: 23364874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer: a correlative study assessing microsatellite instability, MLH1 hypermethylation, DNA mismatch repair protein expression, and PTEN, PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF mutation analysis.
Peterson LM; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Kerr SE; Smith DI; Distad TJ; Clayton AC; Medeiros F
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 May; 31(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 22498935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Liquid-Based Endometrial Cytology Using SurePath™ Is Not Inferior to Suction Endometrial Tissue Biopsy in Clinical Performance for Detecting Endometrial Cancer Including Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia.
Yanaki F; Hirai Y; Hanada A; Ishitani K; Matsui H
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 28324882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of tumor morphology with mismatch-repair protein status in older endometrial cancer patients: implications for universal versus selective screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Rabban JT; Calkins SM; Karnezis AN; Grenert JP; Blanco A; Crawford B; Chen LM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 24503759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High-throughput detection of clinically relevant mutations in archived tumor samples by multiplexed PCR and next-generation sequencing.
Bourgon R; Lu S; Yan Y; Lackner MR; Wang W; Weigman V; Wang D; Guan Y; Ryner L; Koeppen H; Patel R; Hampton GM; Amler LC; Wang Y
Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 20(8):2080-91. PubMed ID: 24573554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology.
Amemiya K; Hirotsu Y; Oyama T; Omata M
J Vis Exp; 2018 Mar; (133):. PubMed ID: 29630047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Molecular biomarkers predicting early development of endometrial carcinoma: A pilot study.
Lupini L; Scutiero G; Iannone P; Martinello R; Bassi C; Ravaioli N; Soave I; Bonaccorsi G; Lanza G; Gafà R; Loizzi V; Negrini M; Greco P
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Nov; 28(6):e13137. PubMed ID: 31412428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.
Timmerman S; Van Rompuy AS; Van Gorp T; Vanden Bempt I; Brems H; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Han SN; Neven P; Victoor J; Laenen A; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 31980219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
