These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32653060)

  • 1. US Supreme Court upholds abortion rights, for now.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2020 Jul; 396(10244):85-86. PubMed ID: 32653060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Legal battles over abortion heat up in the USA.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2019 May; 393(10184):1923-1924. PubMed ID: 31084954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion as liberty and right.
    Hobin TJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(16):1441-1443. PubMed ID: 34551227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Court and abortion: worse than you think.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
    Siegel RB
    Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.
    Stark B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Fuleihan C
    Am J Law Med; 2020 Nov; 46(4):507-517. PubMed ID: 33413017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhode Island Medical Society v. Whitehouse.
    U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island
    Fed Suppl; 1999; 66():288-317. PubMed ID: 15584139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--abortion rights--fourth circuit declares Virginia partial birth infanticide statute unconstitutional per se.--Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 422 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2005).
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 16489721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk.
    Hopkins Tanne J
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US Supreme Court protects access to abortion medication.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2679-2680. PubMed ID: 38909610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The US Supreme Court and the Future of Reproductive Health.
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2016 Mar; 94(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 26750425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications for women of Louisiana's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.
    Roberts SC; Fuentes L; Kriz R; Williams V; Upadhyay UD
    Contraception; 2015 May; 91(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 25744615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.