These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32653106)
1. Precompensating for spread of excitation in a cochlear implant coding strategy. Bolner F; Magits S; van Dijk B; Wouters J Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():107977. PubMed ID: 32653106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear. Kan A Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518772963. PubMed ID: 29708063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release. Croghan NBH; Smith ZM Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Stronks HC; Briaire J; Frijns J Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221112762. PubMed ID: 35862265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification. Cullington HE; Zeng FG Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network. De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]