468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32653747)
1. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images.
Ambrosini P; Hollemans E; Kweldam CF; Leenders GJLHV; Stallinga S; Vos F
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14904. PubMed ID: 32913202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.
Marini N; Otálora S; Müller H; Atzori M
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102165. PubMed ID: 34303169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason pattern 4 with cribriform morphology on biopsy is associated with adverse clinicopathological findings in a prospective radical prostatectomy cohort.
Haffner MC; Salles DC; Gao G; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():74-80. PubMed ID: 32119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
