451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32653747)
21. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An update of the Gleason grading system.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new optical density granulometry-based descriptor for the classification of prostate histological images using shallow and deep Gaussian processes.
Esteban ÁE; López-Pérez M; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():303-317. PubMed ID: 31416557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated Gleason Scoring and Tumor Quantification in Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Images Using Deep Neural Networks and Its Comparison with Pathologist-Based Assessment.
Ryu HS; Jin MS; Park JH; Lee S; Cho J; Oh S; Kwak TY; Woo JI; Mun Y; Kim SW; Hwang S; Shin SJ; Chang H
Cancers (Basel); 2019 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31769420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy Enables Gleason Scoring of Prostate Core Needle Biopsy by a Convolutional Neural Network.
Ao J; Shao X; Liu Z; Liu Q; Xia J; Shi Y; Qi L; Pan J; Ji M
Cancer Res; 2023 Feb; 83(4):641-651. PubMed ID: 36594873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ProGleason-GAN: Conditional progressive growing GAN for prostatic cancer Gleason grade patch synthesis.
Golfe A; Del Amor R; Colomer A; Sales MA; Terradez L; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107695. PubMed ID: 37393742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification.
Otálora S; Marini N; Müller H; Atzori M
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):77. PubMed ID: 33964886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.
Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
Int J Biol Markers; 2018 Nov; 33(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 29945478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Co-trained convolutional neural networks for automated detection of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI.
Yang X; Liu C; Wang Z; Yang J; Min HL; Wang L; Cheng KT
Med Image Anal; 2017 Dec; 42():212-227. PubMed ID: 28850876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet.
Ramamurthy K; Varikuti AR; Gupta B; Aswani N
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 36332194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer.
Czaja RC; Tarima S; Wu R; Palagnmonthip W; Iczkowski KA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151725. PubMed ID: 33610958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy.
Tom MC; Nguyen JK; Lucianò R; Mian OY; Stephans KL; Ciezki JP; Smile TD; Wei W; McKenney JK; Magi-Galluzzi C; Tendulkar RD
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):710-716. PubMed ID: 31059665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A distinct repertoire of cancer-associated fibroblasts is enriched in cribriform prostate cancer.
Hesterberg AB; Rios BL; Wolf EM; Tubbs C; Wong HY; Schaffer KR; Lotan TL; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Hurley PJ
J Pathol Clin Res; 2021 May; 7(3):271-286. PubMed ID: 33600062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.
Melo PAS; Estivallet CLN; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Leite KRM
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e3198. PubMed ID: 34730614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
