These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32654141)

  • 1. Can we understand food oral processing using Kano model? Case study with confectionery products.
    Djekic I; Ilic J; Guiné RPF; Tomasevic I
    J Texture Stud; 2020 Dec; 51(6):861-869. PubMed ID: 32654141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation.
    Forde CG; van Kuijk N; Thaler T; de Graaf C; Martin N
    Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):208-219. PubMed ID: 23017464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of product and oral characteristics on swallowing.
    Engelen L; Fontijn-Tekamp A; van der Bilt A
    Arch Oral Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 15958205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of oral processing on appetite and food intake - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Krop EM; Hetherington MM; Nekitsing C; Miquel S; Postelnicu L; Sarkar A
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():253-269. PubMed ID: 29408331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation.
    Zijlstra N; de Wijk RA; Mars M; Stafleu A; de Graaf C
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 90(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 19515731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of instrumental texture properties from textural profile analysis (TPA) with eating behaviours and macronutrient composition for a wide range of solid foods.
    Wee MSM; Goh AT; Stieger M; Forde CG
    Food Funct; 2018 Oct; 9(10):5301-5312. PubMed ID: 30256358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft confectionery products: Quality parameters, interactions with processing and ingredients.
    Gunes R; Palabiyik I; Konar N; Said Toker O
    Food Chem; 2022 Aug; 385():132735. PubMed ID: 35318175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age, gender, ethnicity and eating capability influence oral processing behaviour of liquid, semi-solid and solid foods differently.
    Ketel EC; Aguayo-Mendoza MG; de Wijk RA; de Graaf C; Piqueras-Fiszman B; Stieger M
    Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():143-151. PubMed ID: 30884642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral processing of hydrogels: Influence of food material properties versus individuals' eating capability.
    Krop EM; Hetherington MM; Miquel S; Sarkar A
    J Texture Stud; 2020 Feb; 51(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 31454088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased chewing reduces energy intake, but not postprandial glucose and insulin, in healthy weight and overweight young adults.
    Borvornparadorn M; Sapampai V; Champakerdsap C; Kurupakorn W; Sapwarobol S
    Nutr Diet; 2019 Feb; 76(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 29767425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of food volume per mouthful on chewing and bolus properties.
    Goto T; Nakamich A; Watanabe M; Nagao K; Matsuyama M; Ichikawa T
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 141():58-62. PubMed ID: 25582518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of bite size and duration of oral processing on retro-nasal aroma release - features contributing to meal termination.
    Ruijschop RM; Zijlstra N; Boelrijk AE; Dijkstra A; Burgering MJ; Graaf Cd; Westerterp-Plantenga MS
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Jan; 105(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 20836901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individuality of masticatory performance and of masticatory muscle temporal parameters.
    Tewksbury CD; Callaghan KX; Fulks BA; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jun; 90():113-124. PubMed ID: 29597061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased textural complexity in food enhances satiation.
    Larsen DS; Tang J; Ferguson LR; James BJ
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():189-94. PubMed ID: 27235823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relating oral physiology and anatomy of consumers varying in age, gender and ethnicity to food oral processing behavior.
    Ketel EC; de Wijk RA; de Graaf C; Stieger M
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Mar; 215():112766. PubMed ID: 31812520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of chewing rate on meal intake.
    Paphangkorakit J; Kanpittaya K; Pawanja N; Pitiphat W
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Feb; 127(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30378710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review.
    Pereira LJ; van der Bilt A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 43(8):630-48. PubMed ID: 27061099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of food diameter on bite size per mouthful and chewing behavior.
    Shiozawa K; Ohnuki Y; Mototani Y; Umeki D; Ito A; Saeki Y; Hanada N; Okumura S
    J Physiol Sci; 2016 Jan; 66(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 26493202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyols in confectionery: the route to sugar-free, reduced sugar and reduced calorie confectionery.
    Zumbé A; Lee A; Storey D
    Br J Nutr; 2001 Mar; 85 Suppl 1():S31-45. PubMed ID: 11318000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.
    Lasschuijt MP; Mars M; Stieger M; Miquel-Kergoat S; de Graaf C; Smeets P
    Physiol Behav; 2017 Jul; 176():76-83. PubMed ID: 28174138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.