141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32654351)
1. Global data of unprotected skin minimal erythema dose relationship to Individual Typology Angle.
Cole C
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2020 Nov; 36(6):452-459. PubMed ID: 32654351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dose response of erythemal area and intensity on the unprotected skin fits well to a logistic 3P model in SPF tests of a Chinese population, which has the potential to improve the precision and consistency of minimal erythema dose determination.
Qu D; Liao F; Liu J; Li X; Ye C; Zheng Y; Xie X; Yi J; Lai W
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2023 Nov; 39(6):633-641. PubMed ID: 37667596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the factors influencing sun protection factors (SPF): Pooling data from multiple studies involving two reference ISO 24444:2019 sunscreen products (P2 and P8).
Granger C; Trullàs C; Sokeechand NB; Jourdan E; Krutmann J; Francois-Newton V; Hosenally M
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2024 Jan; 40(1):e12942. PubMed ID: 38288771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal in vivo Testing of Sun Protection Factor.
Rohr M; Ernst N; Schrader A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2018; 31(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 29791917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship of sun protection factor to minimal erythema dose, Japanese skin type, and skin color.
Kawada A; Noda T; Hiruma M; Ishibashi A; Arai S
J Dermatol; 1993 Aug; 20(8):514-6. PubMed ID: 8245315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sun protection factor measurement of sunscreens is dependent on minimal erythema dose.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Stc Barnetson R
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 141(3):502-7. PubMed ID: 10583055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A broad spectrum high-SPF photostable sunscreen with a high UVA-PF can protect against cellular damage at high UV exposure doses.
Cole C; Appa Y; Ou-Yang H
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 24806442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevention of ultraviolet-induced skin pigmentation.
Moyal D
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2004 Oct; 20(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 15379874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardisation of minimal erythematous dose reading and assessment: a new system.
Bertin C; Nollent V; Nkengne A; Oun E; Tokgoz-Engrand S; Mojon A
Skin Res Technol; 2016 Nov; 22(4):423-429. PubMed ID: 26842225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reciprocity for solar simulators used in sunscreen testing.
Sayre RM; Kaidbey KH
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1990 Oct; 7(5):198-201. PubMed ID: 2091743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultraviolet A sunscreen evaluations in normal subjects.
Stanfield JW; Feldt PA; Csortan ES; Krochmal L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 May; 20(5 Pt 1):744-8. PubMed ID: 2715428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sun protection factor: meaning and controversies.
Schalka S; Reis VM
An Bras Dermatol; 2011; 86(3):507-15. PubMed ID: 21738968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Characterization of sun protection performance: Quo vadis?].
Osterwalder U; Surber C
Hautarzt; 2022 Apr; 73(4):276-282. PubMed ID: 35333933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New noninvasive approach assessing in vivo sun protection factor (SPF) using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and in vitro transmission.
Ruvolo Junior E; Kollias N; Cole C
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 24417335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outdoor sunscreen testing with high-intensity solar exposure in a Chinese and Caucasian population.
Granger C; Ong G; Andres P; Trullàs C; Hosenally M; Lai W; Liu W; Krutmann J; Passeron T; Lim HW
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 Jan; 38(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34157168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of minimal erythema dose with a reflectance melanin meter.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Barnetson RS
Br J Dermatol; 1997 May; 136(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 9205504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vivo study to evaluate the influence of oil blotting paper on the efficacy of sunscreen.
Sampattavanich N; Chandayani N; Intarasupht J; Nakakes A
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2021 Jul; 37(4):324-328. PubMed ID: 33426707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outdoor clinical testing with reference sunscreens to determine differences in skin response between populations of different ethnicity: A combined data analysis from 128 subjects.
Granger C; Passeron T; Trullas C; Hosenally M; Sokeechand BN; Krutmann J; Lim HW
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2023 Sep; 39(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 36867064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the Influence of the Antiphlogistic Ingredients Panthenol and Bisabolol on the SPF Value in vivo.
Werner M; Herling M; Garbe B; Theek C; Tronnier H; Heinrich U; Braun N
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2017; 30(6):284-291. PubMed ID: 28972949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types.
Pissavini M; Tricaud C; Wiener G; Lauer A; Contier M; Kolbe L; Trullás Cabanas C; Boyer F; Meredith E; de Lapuente J; Dietrich E; Matts PJ
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2020 Oct; 42(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 32390187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
