323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32654512)
1. How Accurate Is Computer-Assisted Orbital Hypertelorism Surgery? Comparison of the Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning with the Postoperative Outcomes.
Batut C; Paré A; Kulker D; Listrat A; Laure B
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(6):433-440. PubMed ID: 32654512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstructive Operation of Severe Orbital Hypertelorism With Computer-Assisted Precise Virtual Plan.
Ouyang L; Li B; Xu S; Jin Q; Chen Y; Gui L; Fu J; Niu F
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 34(2):511-514. PubMed ID: 36217222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In support of using computer-aided design and modeling for periorbital osteotomies.
Tahiri Y; Taylor JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 25534060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.
Roser SM; Ramachandra S; Blair H; Grist W; Carlson GW; Christensen AM; Weimer KA; Steed MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2824-32. PubMed ID: 20828910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monobloc and facial bipartition osteotomies: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on computed tomography scans.
Posnick JC; Waitzman A; Armstrong D; Pron G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Apr; 53(4):358-67; discussion 368. PubMed ID: 7699489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-in-one surgical guide: A new method for cranial vault resection and reconstruction.
Tel A; Costa F; Sembronio S; Lazzarotto A; Robiony M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):967-973. PubMed ID: 29716817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applications of 3D orbital computer-assisted surgery (CAS).
Scolozzi P
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 118(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 28642192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hypertelorism: the importance of three-dimensional imaging and trends in the surgical correction by facial bipartition.
Moreira Gonzalez A; Elahi M; Barakat K; Yavuzer R; Brinkmann B; Jackson IT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 May; 115(6):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15861056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted midface reconstruction in Treacher Collins syndrome part 1: skeletal reconstruction.
Herlin C; Doucet JC; Bigorre M; Khelifa HC; Captier G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):670-5. PubMed ID: 23454266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted planning, stereolithographic modeling, and intraoperative navigation for complex orbital reconstruction: a descriptive study in a preliminary cohort.
Bell RB; Markiewicz MR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2559-70. PubMed ID: 19925972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypertelorism correction with facial bipartition and box osteotomy: does soft tissue translation correlate with bony movement?
Breakey W; Abela C; Evans R; Jeelani O; Britto J; Hayward R; Dunaway D
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 25469891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-Assisted Surgery in Facial Bipartition Surgery.
Schlund M; Paré A; Joly A; Laure B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1094.e1-1094.e7. PubMed ID: 29353636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of three-dimensional, CAD/CAM-assisted, virtual surgical simulation and planning in the pediatric craniofacial population.
Gray R; Gougoutas A; Nguyen V; Taylor J; Bastidas N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():163-169. PubMed ID: 28483229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The advantages of advanced computer-assisted diagnostics and three-dimensional preoperative planning on implant position in orbital reconstruction.
Jansen J; Schreurs R; Dubois L; Maal TJJ; Gooris PJJ; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 46(4):715-721. PubMed ID: 29548880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniosynostosis surgery.
Seruya M; Borsuk DE; Khalifian S; Carson BS; Dalesio NM; Dorafshar AH
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1100-5. PubMed ID: 23851748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of orbital hypertelorism using inverted U-shaped osteotomy.
Shen W; Cui J; Chen J; Ying ZX
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):415-7. PubMed ID: 25699535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical treatment of orbital hypertelorism: Historical evolution and development prospects.
Batut C; Joly A; Travers N; Guichard B; Paré A; Laure B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1712-1719. PubMed ID: 31519384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of a Novel Augmented Reality-Based Navigation System in Treatment of Orbital Hypertelorism.
Zhu M; Chai G; Lin L; Xin Y; Tan A; Bogari M; Zhang Y; Li Q
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 77(6):662-668. PubMed ID: 26545227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D visualization and simulation in surgical planning system of orbital hypertelorism.
Xie K; Yang S; Zhu YM
J Med Syst; 2011 Aug; 35(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 20703527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual 3D planning of osteotomies for craniosynostoses and complex craniofacial malformations.
Laure B; Louisy A; Joly A; Travers N; Listrat A; Pare A
Neurochirurgie; 2019 Nov; 65(5):269-278. PubMed ID: 31568779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
